- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 14,753
- Reaction score
- 8,805
- Country

This is not the look of terror



No. It’s about the lawful use of forceIs it about the right to protest, including filming law enforcement?
Was you trying to chat her up?

So they have sufficient powers to do their work as federal law enforcement officers.again.![]()

She obviously attempted to cause an obstruction and was ordered to stop. She failed to comply and the only real debate is whether the officer who shot her had grounds because she was or was not putting him in serious danger.I see you and all the rest of the pro-murder loons are unable to show where Renee Good prevented those masked murderers from checking passports.
I'll wait....
Passport checking.So they have sufficient powers to do their work as federal law enforcement officers.
We covered it pages ago.Thought so.

ExactlySuppose they carry guns for a reason?
She did? Well she failed because the lane was clear.She obviously attempted to cause an obstruction
No. It’s about the lawful use of force

Peaceful protesting, yes. Driving your car at an agent, no. It is pretty clear on that basis.There are two different parts of the constitution in play here. One concerns the right to protest and film law enforcement. If people are arrested for doing that, it is a breach of the First Amendment. The other concerns the Fourth Amendment and the lawful use of force,
How, when asked to move your car away from agents, do you do so when your car is surrounded by them?Peaceful protesting, yes. Driving your car at an agent, no. It is pretty clear on that basis.

There are two different parts of the constitution in play here. One concerns the right to protest and film law enforcement. If people are arrested for doing that, it is a breach of the First Amendment. The other concerns the Fourth Amendment and the lawful use of force.

Her car wasn't long enough to cover the full width of the road,She did? Well she failed because the lane was clear.
Next.