ICE told to get the eff out

  • Thread starter Thread starter JP_
  • Start date Start date
home goal there then. She had no right to resist, glad we agree

Is this the Minnesota law?

'609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS, ARREST, OR FIREFIGHTING.​

Subdivision 1.​


Whoever intentionally does any of the following may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2:

(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense;

(2) obstructs, resists, or interferes with a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of official duties;

(3) interferes with or obstructs a firefighter while the firefighter is engaged in the performance of official duties;

(4) interferes with or obstructs a member of an ambulance service personnel crew, as defined in section 144E.001, subdivision 3a, who is providing, or attempting to provide, emergency care; or

(5) by force or threat of force endeavors to obstruct any employee of the Department of Revenue, Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division, a driver's license agent appointed under section 171.061, or a deputy registrar appointed under section 168.33 while the employee is lawfully engaged in the performance of official duties for the purpose of deterring or interfering with the performance of those duties.'
 
Is this the Minnesota law?

'609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS, ARREST, OR FIREFIGHTING.​

Subdivision 1.​


Whoever intentionally does any of the following may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2:

(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense;

(2) obstructs, resists, or interferes with a peace officer while the officer is engaged in the performance of official duties;

(3) interferes with or obstructs a firefighter while the firefighter is engaged in the performance of official duties;

(4) interferes with or obstructs a member of an ambulance service personnel crew, as defined in section 144E.001, subdivision 3a, who is providing, or attempting to provide, emergency care; or

(5) by force or threat of force endeavors to obstruct any employee of the Department of Revenue, Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services Division, a driver's license agent appointed under section 171.061, or a deputy registrar appointed under section 168.33 while the employee is lawfully engaged in the performance of official duties for the purpose of deterring or interfering with the performance of those duties.'
wrong way around - you need to look for any remaining laws that give an individual the right to resist an unlawful arrest.
 
The lane was clear to traffic. Cars were passing whilst she was being murdered. She was sat in her car whilst masked murderers moved freely around her car.

Next.
The traffic had to go around her car and move into another lane. That is not free flowing.
Next..
 
wrong way around - you need to look for any remaining laws that give an individual the right to resist an unlawful arrest.
No you don't. American citizens don't exist under the premise that that are liable to be spontaneously arrested without probable cause.

Maybe this could help..

Yes, a federal officer can arrest an innocent U.S. citizen, as mistakes happen, but they lack legal authority to target citizens without cause, particularly immigration agents who should only detain non-citizens, meaning such arrests are often unlawful and result in lawsuits, though agents can arrest citizens for committing federal crimes like aiding illegal immigration or other offenses they witness. While immigration officers (ICE) usually focus on non-citizens, other federal agencies like the FBI can arrest citizens for federal offenses, but all arrests must adhere to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure,
 
No you don't. American citizens don't exist under the premise that that are liable to be spontaneously arrested without probable cause.

Maybe this could help..

Yes, a federal officer can arrest an innocent U.S. citizen, as mistakes happen, but they lack legal authority to target citizens without cause, particularly immigration agents who should only detain non-citizens, meaning such arrests are often unlawful and result in lawsuits, though agents can arrest citizens for committing federal crimes like aiding illegal immigration or other offenses they witness. While immigration officers (ICE) usually focus on non-citizens, other federal agencies like the FBI can arrest citizens for federal offenses, but all arrests must adhere to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure,
It doesn't matter if the arrest is unlawful. You need a specific right to resist otherwise your actions can be unlawful or you get shot and killed.

Do you think if a policeman in the UK tried to arrest you without reasonable suspicion you could resist? You'd get a kicking.
 
It doesn't matter if the arrest is unlawful
What doesn't?
You need a specific right to resist otherwise your actions can be unlawful or you get shot and killed
Like probable cause.
Do you think if a policeman in the UK tried to arrest you without reasonable suspicion you could resist?
Yes, of course you can question why you are being arrested.
You'd get a kicking
Better than being plugged three times by a woman hating masked psychopath, with zero probable cause.



Was she being arrested? What were the arresting officers instructions to that effect? Was she suspected of being a non-citizen?
 
Back
Top