There was no justification for a passport checker to arrest herSurely, the right to resist unlawful arrest by a federal agent is the same in every state.
There was no justification for a passport checker to arrest herSurely, the right to resist unlawful arrest by a federal agent is the same in every state.

The right to resist an unlawful arrest is different in every state. Didn't you know that?Surely, the right to resist unlawful arrest by a federal agent is the same in every state.
Anyway, the point was whether she had to comply with unlawful orders.

No its not clear cut at all.Here's a question... Does anyone think this case is simple or clear-cut?
I don't. It's complex. But she shouldn't have created the situation by driving directly at an armed police officer.
But there's a lot of language by some suggesting it was simple.
No it's actually not. Didn't you know that?
“….Resisting arrest by a federal officer is governed by federal law not state law…..”Surely, the right to resist unlawful arrest by a federal agent is the same in every state.

home goal there then. She had no right to resist, glad we agree“….Resisting arrest by a federal officer is governed by federal law not state law…..”
Nonsense. What passport checking laws/rules did she break?home goal there then. She had no right to resist, glad we agree

Interfering and blocking the agents undertaking their investigationsNonsense. What passport checking laws/rules did she break?

She either does or does not have a right to resist an unlawful arrest.Nonsense. What passport checking laws/rules did she break?
home goal there then. She had no right to resist, glad we agree
Yes, a federal officer can arrest an innocent U.S. citizen, as mistakes happen, but they lack legal authority to target citizens without cause, particularly immigration agents who should only detain non-citizens, meaning such arrests are often unlawful and result in lawsuits, though agents can arrest citizens for committing federal crimes like aiding illegal immigration or other offenses they witness. While immigration officers (ICE) usually focus on non-citizens, other federal agencies like the FBI can arrest citizens for federal offenses, but all arrests must adhere to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure,She either does or does not have a right to resist an unlawful arrest.
Which is it - according to you?

So she had no right to resist only sue after.. thought so.Yes, a federal officer can arrest an innocent U.S. citizen, as mistakes happen, but they lack legal authority to target citizens without cause, particularly immigration agents who should only detain non-citizens, meaning such arrests are often unlawful and result in lawsuits, though agents can arrest citizens for committing federal crimes like aiding illegal immigration or other offenses they witness. While immigration officers (ICE) usually focus on non-citizens, other federal agencies like the FBI can arrest citizens for federal offenses, but all arrests must adhere to Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure,
Glad we cleared that up
Nope . The road was clear. She was sat in her car, and far from illegal aliensInterfering and blocking the agents undertaking their investigations

They had cause.Yes, a federal officer can arrest an innocent U.S. citizen, as mistakes happen, but they lack legal authority to target citizens without cause,
Glad we cleared that up