Reform Policies

I think the forum trolls are struggling with the idea, that someone can have a nickname that they are perfectly ok with, and has no malice behind it and do not regard as racist, sexist etc at the time, but when they find themselves looking at unemployment due to their failure to perform, suddenly find it to be a great angle to secure a payout.

Its no more complex than that.

But the Dummies want to go in circles.
 
... that someone can have a nickname ...
The nickname only has to have racial connotations. Of course someone can "tolerate" it for years and still find it offensive.
Do you understand the meaning of 'tolerate'?
To tolerate means to accept, allow, or endure something—particularly something unpleasant, annoying, or disliked—without prohibition, interference, or complaint.
 
And still no answer. The RWR sure live up to their ignorance.
You seem to be failing to understand that there is a difference between.
Racism - apply your appropriate dictionary definition, hatred, prejudice, etc.
Reference to a protected characteristic in the workplace, that is not intended to offend.

Do you see a difference?
 
You seem to be failing to understand that there is a difference between.
Racism - apply your appropriate dictionary definition, hatred, prejudice, etc.
Reference to a protected characteristic in the workplace, that is not intended to offend.

Do you see a difference?
It's not about whether the offence was intended, it's about whether it has the capacity to offend.
It's about the impact not the intent.
And no racist is ever going to admit intent. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top