Who can blame them with job adverts encouraging [not them] to apply.
You keep getting it so &rse about face it is embarrassing to watch.
Who can blame them with job adverts encouraging [not them] to apply.

All the research says you are wrong. DEI is highly resented.You keep getting it so &rse about face it is embarrassing to watch.

I don't think he is getting it wrong when adverts state etnic minoritys are particularly welcome to apply.You keep getting it so &rse about face it is embarrassing to watch.

I'm guessing you haven't done much recruitment in your career. None of this nonsense is necessary to attract the best candidates.Would adverts like this be more acceptable:
'We particularly welcome applications from lazy people who don't have the minimum qualifications required because they are currently under represented in our organisation.'

I doubt they would get the caliber of person that they wantWould adverts like this be more acceptable:
'We particularly welcome applications from lazy people who don't have the minimum qualifications required because they are currently under represented in our organisation.'

Medical drugs administered by a Dr is different, but I am glad they saved your eldest sons life in all sincerity.Not all drugs are bad for us. They saved my eldest child's' life, when he was but a dot.
I doubt they would get the caliber of person that they want

public sector?It seemed to work at our place.
public sector?
I'm guessing you haven't done much recruitment in your career. None of this nonsense is necessary to attract the best candidates.

because each individual is not responsible or accountable for the success of others who they share a category with. Its not their faultI've never understood what is wrong with 'artificially levelling the playing field'.
It means giving more attention to one category at the expense of others.It's a neat soundbite, but what does it actually mean.
not peopleAll sorts of things which are out of whack benefit from being levelled artificially.
The alternative is encourage each individual to be the best version of themselves, they can be.The alternative is to leave things in a sub-optimal state.
The alternative is encourage each individual to be the best version of themselves, they can be.

I don't think that has been the case for years. Companies are paranoid about vexatious litigation through hiring policies. There is nothing wrong with opening people's minds and getting them to address their unconscious bias etc. But there is no need for adverts "we are particularly keen to receive applications from [not you]".That is difficult if their application is three times more likely to go straight in the bin.
They are still drugs are they not?Medical drugs administered by a Dr is different