Reform Policies

[noseall]

did you delete it

No, I did not.

 

[noseall]

The post was removed.

Unlikely.

 

[noseall]

Its not parity its lurching from discrimination of one kind to another.

Heaven forbid. Imagine whiteys having to endure 300 years of that shít.

 

[noseall]

You were defending odds on his drug thread and I said so you would be ok with your kids taking drugs then.

Nonsense. Show the post.

Have a look in the thread 'an awkward Christmas for lefties' to see where you went wrong.

 

[Highway Man]

Nonsense. Show the post.

Have a look in the thread 'an awkward Christmas for lefties' to see where you went wrong.

I never went wrong, I asked if you wouldnt mind your kids taking drugs then, your reply

That depends on the drugs.

I would always opt for the truth. If the truth is too blunt, I'd opt for discretion.

 

[King Billy]

moving on, and back on topic.

 

[King Billy]

It would be nice to see these trolls being as passionate about decrying anti semitism.

You're conflating antiSemitism with protest against Israeli genocide.
Show us this supposed antiSemitism.
If you can't see the difference how can you expect to have an objective view.

 

[King Billy]

For god sakes,

• Context of Controversy: In 2009, it was reported that Prince Harry used "Sooty" as a nickname for a friend from South Asia, which was criticized as a "hate word" by the individual's father, although the friend reportedly was not offended.

That's not the end of the story:

Following publication of Prince Harry's remarks, recorded three years ago, the prime minister branded them unacceptable. The prince faces a dressing down from his commanding officer in the Household Cavalry Regiment.
A St James's Palace spokesman said the 24-year-old prince was "extremely sorry" and stressed he had been speaking to a friend without malice.

 

[King Billy]

It cannot be made any simpler.

It's amazing how dishonest posters are unable to provide a simple and straightforward answer to a simple and straightforward question.

Has it reached 10 pages and 50 times the question has been asked yet, and still they refuse to answer it.

Now if there was an olympic sport of verbal slalom, HWM and MBK would be joint gold medalists.

The MBK and HWM approach to answering questions:

 

[King Billy]

Nosenowt has said on another thread that he wouldn't mind his kids taking drugs. How very liberal.

 

[King Billy]

I've never understood what is wrong with 'artificially levelling the playing field'.

It's a neat soundbite, but what does it actually mean.

All sorts of things which are out of whack benefit from being levelled artificially.

The alternative is to leave things in a sub-optimal state.

A simple analogy is why some countries excel in some sports. E.g. especially winter sports and water sports.

Technology and innovation goes only a little way toward levelling the playing field.

 

[King Billy]

That is difficult if their application is three times more likely to go straight in the bin.

Or not to arrive in the first place.

 

[King Billy]

I don't think that has been the case for years.

I'm sure I've mentioned it before but a mate of mine who had his own company had a system whereby if he received 50 CV's in the post applying for a job, he'd randomly pick out half of them and throw them in the bin.

 

[King Billy]

because each individual is not responsible or accountable for the success of others who they share a category with. Its not their fault

No-one suggested they are. another strawman argument.

It means giving more attention to one category at the expense of others.

Total nonsense, all applicants get the same attention. More strawman arguments.

not people

Income Support, Child benefit, PIP, etc.
Government/Global support for specific areas, Foreign Aid, Scholarships, Free School Meals, Breakfast clubs, support on exiting foster care, prison, etc.
The list is endless.

The alternative is encourage each individual to be the best version of themselves, they can be.

That's not an alternative, it's an addition to, and already practised in schools, Uni, and employment.

 

[King Billy]

It can achieve an unforeseen outcome. A chap I knew in The local councils HR team said they adopted an internal recruitment first policy. Based on the success of inner London boroughs where a similar policy had increased the number of under represented minority staff. It didn’t work because mateys Council was 99 per cent white and continued to be so. I suspect they knew that all along.

That's not an example of levelling the playing field.
As you report, it is in opposition to levelling the playing field. It's similar to only recruiiting through word of mouth.