Reform Policies

[King Billy]

Its not parity its lurching from discrimination of one kind to another.

Positive Discrimination is unlawful.
Positive Action (to specify that applications from underrepresented groups are welcome) is not.

 

[King Billy]

You have a funny moral compass.

From the poster that tells blatant lies.
Irony or what!

 

[King Billy]

But you said you was fine with your kids taking recreational drugs (dependant) upon the drug? You have a funny moral compass.

He didn't, he said:

Where did I say it's fine for my kids to take recreational drugs?
Nonsense. If I wanted to take recreational drugs, I would not do it in front of my kids. Same reason I cut down on (casual) drinking.

Now you claim:

The post was removed.

How convenient for you, so that you can continue with your dishonest accusation.

 

[King Billy]

I never went wrong, I asked if you wouldnt mind your kids taking drugs then, your reply

You're fixated with your version of what you think was said.
It differs from what was actually said:

So you don’t tell them not to take drugs

That depends on the drugs.

Not all drugs are bad for us.

 

[noseall]

I never went wrong, I asked if you wouldnt mind your kids taking drugs then, your reply

Do you pretend not understand what "that depends on the drugs" means?

Please show where I have said it is ok for my kids to take recreational drugs.

He can't, he won't.

 

[Highway Man]

Do you pretend not understand what "that depends on the drugs" means?

Please show where I have said it is ok for my kids to take recreational drugs.

He can't, he won't.

The conversation was about recreational drug taking, I asked a specific question as you had said that you took recreational drugs, now you are turning it into paracetamol.

 

[noseall]

The conversation was about recreational drug taking, I asked a specific question as you had said that you took recreational drugs, now you are turning it into paracetamol.

Do you know what "that depends on the drugs" means? You can pretend you don't, it matters not. It was a pertinent and distinct reply, irrespective of the conversation.

Perhaps you struggle with English as well as the truth?

 

[noseall]

The conversation was about recreational drug taking

Actually, the conversation wasn't. Either you have a really shít memory or you really struggle to read. Even your own posts.

 

[noseall]

The post was removed.

More lies (sigh).

 

[Highway Man]

Actually, the conversation wasn't. Either you have a really shít memory or you really struggle to read. Even your own posts.

I may have a shít memory, I am the first to admit that, I asked if you would be happy at your kids taking recreational drugs and you replied, it wasn't about parecetamol or any other medical drug. You are trying to wriggle out of a hole that you have landed yourself in. You also said that you took recreational drugs too, yes or no?

 

[Highway Man]

More lies (sigh).

Not lies, I was looking on the wrong thread, you mean more mistakes.

 

[noseall]

I may have a shít memory, I am the first to admit that, I asked if you would be happy at your kids taking recreational drugs and you replied

You never mentioned recreational drugs. Nor was it the topic of conversation. I have linked to the thread. It's there for everyone to read.

, it wasn't about parecetamol or any other medical drug

You said 'drugs'. I said 'it depends on the drugs'.

You are trying to wriggle out of a hole that you have landed yourself in. You also said that you took recreational drugs too, yes or no?

Read the the thread boyo. You are wrong again. Recreational drugs was never mentioned. However 'depends on the drugs' was.

Read for yourself. Or carry on looking like a dishonest lying tit. I care not.

 

[King Billy]

The conversation was about recreational drug taking,

It wasn't. The very first mention of drug taking was by you on page 9 of the thread. The thread was something about lefties and Christmas.

So you don’t tell them not to take drugs or would you tell them the truth and say lots do and enjoy it?

I asked a specific question as you had said that you took recreational drugs, now you are turning it into paracetamol.

You were initially talking about drugs. Now you've moved the goalposts to claim you were talking about recreational drugs.
It's good to see you not resorting to abuse, even though you are being dishonest.

 

[noseall]

It wasn't. The very first mention of drug taking was by you on page 9 of the thread. The thread was something about lefties and Christmas.


You were initially talking about drugs. Now you've moved the goalposts to claim you were talking about recreational drugs.
It's good to see you not resorting to abuse, even though you are being dishonest.

HWM is making a fool out of himself here. It's not a good look.

Standard.

 

[Highway Man]

You never mentioned recreational drugs. Nor was it the topic of conversation. I have linked to the thread. It's there for everyone to read.

You said 'drugs'. I said 'it depends on the drugs'.

Read the the thread boyo. You are wrong again. Recreational drugs was never mentioned. However 'depends on the drugs' was.

Read for yourself. Or carry on looking like a dishonest lying tit. I care not.

I am not interested in your twisting. of lies, you admitted taking recreational drugs thinking somehow that made you look cool, you just came accross as daft, then you said you was ok dependant on the drug that your kids would be allowed to take them. Twist all you like but hat is how you said it, don't blame others for your failings in life.