New High tech cameras to enforce 20mph roads

With any crime, the police give up enforcing the law once a large number of people commit that crime. We see this with parking on the pavement. 20 mph zones, any crime committed by muslims, and of course cannabis....

...Along with the illegal electric bikes, and scooters, noisy exhausts etc.. They only enforce the laws, as token, and to massage the figures..
 
You get poor compliance because some idiot installed them on major roads. There were almost certainly some roads where 20mph made sense, but to have them as the new 30mph and enforce them knowing they don’t make sense to 80% of drives is bonkers.
 
This might explain why some are less bothered than others

Stoke on Trent just 3.2% of urban roads have 20mph, Croydon 81.6%

While not accounting for the entire number, it might be that Croydon has a far greater number of roads that are not suited to cars at all, let alone cars permitted to travel at up to 30mph.

20mph might be the more palatable decision, in comparison with banning vehicles from them altogether.
 
While not accounting for the entire number, it might be that Croydon has a far greater number of roads that are not suited to cars at all, let alone cars permitted to travel at up to 30mph.

20mph might be the more palatable decision, in comparison with banning vehicles from them altogether.
Take a look on google maps, miles and miles of A roads with 20mph limits on them. A232 for example
 
Only with a number of assumptions being in place.

As with many statistics, more useful for pushing a chosen narrative, than for objectively informing.
for example a "40% reduction in the number of people killed"

Which turned out to be over 24 years and a total of 4.

I think most people would consider that to be statistically irrelevant.
 

3/4 of drivers don't comply with the limit

These days I avoid driving in London, but there are huge lengths of arterial roads with 20mph limits on. Now even more fines are coming as the new cameras have longer range, no road markings and don't flash.

You might be fooled in to believing TFL's 20 limits have massively reduced the number of people killed or seriously injured. Ignoring the frequent claims that this is so and looking at the data, you will see it hasn't done much of anything to make a difference.

More control. More surveillance. More Big Brother.

The mugs will lap it up.
 
I got caught speeding a while back

Irony was I was going to the festival of speed

36 /7 in a 30 some mobile plod van

Asked for pic evidence which they sent of the driver told em it was not me which it was not

They made an example of me ?? Got fined nearly 500 squid and 4 points

Total disgrace imo
 
While not accounting for the entire number, it might be that Croydon has a far greater number of roads that are not suited to cars at all, let alone cars permitted to travel at up to 30mph.

20mph might be the more palatable decision, in comparison with banning vehicles from them altogether.
Why would a road, which is designed to carry vehicles, not be suitable for a car?!

Croydon does have some tight side roads, due to terraced houses with only on street parking, you'd drive down those at 20 just out of common sense.

I drove through Croydon recently, into Clapham via Streatham, 90% on main roads, pretty much 20mph all the way, the majority of drivers were going over 20, not by much, but enough to make the journey slightly less tedious. It still took bloody ages to travel just a few miles.
 
Back
Top