New High tech cameras to enforce 20mph roads

[motorbiking]

Interesting non-relevant fact.
Keep your eyes covered when you look at higher speeds vs fatalities and serious accidents and what 20 MPH is all about.

Already posted them, for you to ignore

Glad you mentioned roads where there are no pedestrians or kids wandering about. Makes another valid argument in favour of 20MPH where they do exist.

Nobody has said you should not drive slowly where kids might be wandering about.

Road safety officers and those in favour of slower speeds in built up areas, thank you for your support.

They are here to stay where they are needed. Expect more towns and cities to do the same.

apart from the ones that have been changed back

They are not going away boyo, no matter how many experimental limits are reverted back.

There was nothing experimental about changing the national limit for restricted roads.

 

[JohnD]

Nobody has said you should not drive slowly where kids might be wandering about.

But people who like speeding through busy narrow streets object to the lower speed limit.

 

[noseall]

But people who like speeding through busy narrow streets object to the lower speed limit.

Of course they do. They will ignore the speed limit whenever, because they don't like being told what to do.

 

[noseall]

apart from the ones that have been changed back

Covered. The important ones WILL remain. The irrelevant ones - not. Expect to see more of the same in other towns and cities. 20MPH is here to stay boyo.

 

[motorbiking]

Of course they do. They will ignore the speed limit whenever, because they don't like being told what to do.

But people who like speeding through busy narrow streets object to the lower speed limit.

Not much point in changing the limit impacting everyone else then..
Lots of people object to silly 20mph limits on major A roads. Like this one:

 

[noseall]

Lots of people object to silly 20mph limits on major A roads.

I agree. On big wide roads, it can feel painful. I'm sure those in charge of enforcement will have their reasons and use their discretion where to enforce the limit and where not to.

 

[motorbiking]

I agree. On big wide roads, it can feel painful. I'm sure those in charge of enforcement will have their reasons and use their discretion where to enforce the limit and where not to.

see post no 1

 

[noseall]

see post no 1

Leve it to them. They'll have their reasons.

 

[Highway Man]

Leve it to them. They'll have their reasons.

I wouldnt bank on that..

 

[noseall]

I wouldnt bank on that..

Truth is - me neither.
As long as less people die.

 

[Justin Passing]

You can, I take it, produce a rational, intelligently argued case which shows that I've been posting cynically, just to create conflict? To argue for the sake of arguing as some kind of perverse fun? To sow division?

No - of course you can't. You accuse me of trolling because you cannot manage anything better.

Trivial.

All you're saying is that lower speeds kill fewer people.
Not worth saying. It does not support all reduction of speed.

We accept a probablility of injury.
It's a common stupidity. British rail said their number one priority is safety. Nope, it's to run a railway.

You seem to just sit in your chair trying to find reason to attack anyone because it's possible, not through a position of common sense.
Dumb Trolling.

 

[noseall]

British rail said their number one priority is safety. Nope, it's to run a railway.

Death is very costly. It has cost many businesses their existence and even put business bosses in prison.

 

[motorbiking]

It's good when governments listen to people and realise they got it wrong. It's worrying when they think more of the failed same is the answer. But sometimes it takes a while.

Not to mention that the above is fake.

 

[Highway Man]

It's good when governments listen to people and realise they got it wrong. It's worrying when they think more of the failed same is the answer. But sometimes it takes a while.

Not to mention that the above is fake.

Morqthana? Agreed.

 

[Justin Passing]

Do their wants count for nothing? Must everything only and always be about what car drivers want?

NOBODY SAID THAT
You make strawman arguments like the above, on and on. etc etc etc
SOmeone makes a point, you come out with someting like that. Go away.

A lot of what you say is incorrect which a few seconds' review would show, but you're too self-indulgent.
You have no balance.

You seem to be sitting there typing because you want to say something, not because you have anything to say. Addicted to your own output apparently, you have to use it day and night, regardless of what crap comes out.

Most of what you type is wrong, irrelevant or obvious. Not worth reading, and replying is feeding the troll.