So we're told.The person responsible - from the FO - has resigned. It’s not scapegoating to sack someone who wrongly thought he was doing the PM a service by keeping quiet.
It's like living in Russia.
It all sounds unbelievable.
So we're told.The person responsible - from the FO - has resigned. It’s not scapegoating to sack someone who wrongly thought he was doing the PM a service by keeping quiet.
If he has technically resigned, its only because he was told by the PM and the Foreign Secretary that they'd lost confidence in him.The person responsible - from the FO - has resigned. It’s not scapegoating to sack someone who wrongly thought he was doing the PM a service by keeping quiet.
Would you be interested in buying some beans from me? They're magical beans ...The person responsible - from the FO - has resigned. It’s not scapegoating to sack someone who wrongly thought he was doing the PM a service by keeping quiet.
Thousands of cases, he can’t possibly know the details of each one

A 10 year old could have told him it was a bad idea so why the hell did he go ahead.
It’s looking that wayTeflon Tony now its non stick starmer

Only those on welfare and in a trades union will be voting for a Labour councillor.
In this case of course he should have been told. But he decided he wanted Mandy and the official made a semi political decision to keep quiet. There would have been a chat between Robins and McSweenie though.Not sure that argument holds much water. Mandleson was vetted for the most senior overseas appointment and failed it. Surely with his somewhat dubious history Starmer would have wanted to know the details?
“I wasn’t told” isn’t a defence imho
Not sure if it's been mentioned here, apparently Labour is trying to get next weeks PMQs cancelled.