If there is a fire and someone is injured or killed you will soon find out that a means of escape was required. May be worth having a serious discussion with local council to see exactly what is required.
Well perhaps not if they're excluded from needing to be compliant, at least on paper.If there is a fire and someone is injured or killed you will soon find out that a means of escape was required. May be worth having a serious discussion with local council to see exactly what is required.



Some people wont be told. Ask for advice, get it then ignore it because its not what they wanted to hear. In a previous life I was a risk manager for a multi billion £ international company but what the hell do I know.I really think you should seek guidance from your local authority building control. If you don't, and the worst happens, there could be serious consequences.
It isn't worth the risk.
so does the insure sign off the risk assessment or does this become a bun fight if things go wrong....? My example of this is that to enter the little hayloft (bedroom) is by way of an old oak vertical through a trap ladder...Safe as houses, risk free, ladder access..would I need to get this sort of signed off in any way.
Well the OP needs to ascertain if Building Regs apply or not, I daresay they may have been excluded, after all such bothies seemingly exist all over the country and it's doubtful many would comply with any Building Regs, so there may be certain criteria that permits them to be excluded, probably no raised sleeping platforms or connection to mains water etc so the OP may be scuppered in anycase but the OP needs to ascertain this. I would also suspect that they're local Building Control, possibly not being familiar with such buildings will probably just say it needs Regs approval anyway, if the OP can even get hold of an inspector to discuss it rather than the bod answering the phone, which is doubtful nowadays. Or maybe the OP lives in the Hebrides or wherever where such buildings are more common and the local BC will have more knowledge.You have been repeatedly advised that what you intend, is a really seriously bad idea. It has nothing at all to do with whether you intend charging, or not for the use of this facility, the legality remains exactly the same. You are inviting members of the public, to make use of an unsafe facility. Should the worst happen, you will find yourself facing a charge of manslaughter.
Imagine yourself asleep up the ladder, in that loft, and a fire begins down below. How do you get out safely?

What I propose would have smoke detection and escape (nobody even asked this) full of assumption.

Not the ones I deal with, the are normally very helpful.As said I dont ask Planning office or BC for advice opinion as they are so stuck in there thinking,
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local