- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 2,853
- Reaction score
- 146
- Country

Unable to form a coherent sentence?
Must be the time of the day.
It's midnight here. Have you fallen over in a drunken stupor?

Unable to form a coherent sentence?

I doubt that anyone suffering from ADHD will attempt to read it,

Yes, sorry, my lazy approach to those that can't, or refuse to, read the whole post. But manage to form an opinion of it all the same.Is it ADHD, the actual neurological condition?
Or is it a mix of a simple difficulty in maintaining the mental effort of reading for long enough, and a bias which leads to a lack of willingness to work at something difficult?
You do neurodiverse people no favours by conflating them with those who are simply just thick and lazy.
Point missed as usual. "Far right thugs" was what Starmer called the working classes on TV shortly after he got into power. This was the point immediately before he became the most hated PM ever.Good of you to recognise it.
Far-right racist, I can see that, but you don't come across as a violent thug.
So ADHD is someone with a life, who doesn't have the inclination to read a load of waffle about nothing?Yes, sorry, my lazy approach to those that can't, or refuse to, read the whole post. But manage to form an opinion of it all the same.
Being a far right thug is honourable?Point missed as usual. "Far right thugs" was what Starmer called the working classes on TV shortly after he got into power. This was the point immediately before he became the most hated PM ever.
It became a badge of honour. E.g. the woman cutting my hair and I agreed that we were both now far-right. About three quarters of the country are according to Starmer.
It's called sarcasm. It's a subtle thing, it may be too complicated for you.
Perhaps they don't teach you the subtleties of British behaviour at FSB troll camp. I'll attempt to explain.Being a far right thug is honourable?
How?
Badge of honour. FFS. How low have the RWR stooped.
Violent serial offender and jailbird Yaxley Lennon and his ilk. Correct."far-right thug"
Starmer got voted in by 30-odd% of the votes."oppressed majority"![]()
We'll see what the local election results look like, they only have doleys left now.

I doubt very much if your recollection is remotely accurate.what Starmer called the working classes on TV
"oppressed majority"Starmer got voted in by 30-odd% of the votes.
Or about 20% of those eligible to vote.
Since then, about three quarters of them have abandoned Labour.
So Labour could have about 5% support, in other words 95% oppose them.
We'll see what the local election results look like, they only have doleys left now.

It's mainly a local and devolved election, Starmer is not up for re-election in this election.Starmer got voted in by 30-odd% of the votes.
Or about 20% of those eligible to vote.
Since then, about three quarters of them have abandoned Labour.
So Labour could have about 5% support, in other words 95% oppose them.
We'll see what the local election results look like, they only have doleys left now.
I doubt very much if your recollection is remotely accurate.