contrails (chemtrails)

[aveatry]

Nonsense.

Firstly - yes they do. And they do it often. And some with a lot of fuel on board.

I dont think they do often land fully laden - (I am thinking that you are just spouting) -- go and google it and prove you are right on this

So, I will ask again - How do they decontaminate that fuel for a non con day? Especially if the non con day is the same day.

Simple answer AGAIN --NO they dont bother taking it off they just leave it in. And that perfectly explains why on a non chem day that you may still see an odd one about.

 

[noseall]

I dont think they do often land fully laden

Not what I said.

Simple answer AGAIN --NO they dont bother taking it off they just leave it in. And that perfectly explains why on a non chem day that you may still see an odd one about.

So there are not dedicated chem days or con days as you said previously? So any day can be a chem day or any day can be a con day?

 

[aveatry]

Not what I said.


So there are not dedicated chem days or con days as you said previously? So any day can be a chem day or any day can be a con day?

Done with you now - got things to do

 

[noseall]

Done with you now - got things to do

Goodbye loser.

 

[wv62]

So what happens if the plane is a prop jobbie? They get filled up from the same pipeline as the jets so would also be filled with 'chemicals' or does Fawley refinery have two seperate pipelines to Heathrow, one for jets and one for turboprops?

 

[wv62]

Another question. Is it all airports worldwide that fill up with the chemicals or just selected ones? My local airport (Cardiff) doesn't have a pipeline. It gets its fuel by tanker from Stanlow so I assume all major refineries are in on it?

 

[IT Minion]

Have a google then and see if that fuel gets pumped out maybe on the grounds of safety and if it had to turn back for a fault then I am sure they would remove the fuel.

That doesn't happen.

 

[IT Minion]

No I can not but I am so confiden

This is exactly your problem, you have utter confidence but no knowledge. Fanatic.

 

[IT Minion]

there is never a mix of some long some short- you need to get out more and pay attention and look up.

And that perfectly explains why on a non chem day that you may still see an odd one about.

Something that never happens, but does happen.

 

[Justin Passing]

That's my point I can guarantee that if I see them (Chem) then everyone else can because it is a "spraying day" - Not actual spraying - its in the fuel remember. Proves its not atmospheric - doesn’t make sense that the exact same atmospheric prevail all over England at the same time. Then if you say it does happen like that then explain the two planes same height bla bla that was witnessed, you can not have it as patchy atmospherics and also blanket to try and debunk. What happens is its either chem - or its not chem there is never any on and off as the planes go through - said patches.

Told you already, it could be a slight variation in the fuel or the engine settings. Exhaust tempeature would make a difference to the nucleation of condensed droplets. It's a thermodynamic effect.
You have no evidence of any chemical.

The fact that you dismiss sensible suggestions tells us that you want to embrace your conspiracy theory no matter what. You're heavily biased, to save face.
Which leaves you "gaslighting".

 

[noseall]

Which leaves you "gaslighting".

That's a polite word for trolling.

 

[aveatry]

So what happens if the plane is a prop jobbie? They get filled up from the same pipeline as the jets so would also be filled with 'chemicals' or does Fawley refinery have two seperate pipelines to Heathrow, one for jets and one for turboprops?

Don't fly high enough

 

[aveatry]

Another question. Is it all airports worldwide that fill up with the chemicals or just selected ones? My local airport (Cardiff) doesn't have a pipeline. It gets its fuel by tanker from Stanlow so I assume all major refineries are in on it?

No not all airports

 

[aveatry]

Told you already, it could be a slight variation in the fuel or the engine settings. Exhaust tempeature would make a difference to the nucleation of condensed droplets. It's a thermodynamic effect.
You have no evidence of any chemical.

There is just so much twisting and turning to try and explain away somthing that our very own government has said they will be doing.

The fact that you dismiss sensible suggestions tells us that you want to embrace your conspiracy theory no matter what. You're heavily biased, to save face.
Which leaves you "gaslighting".

The best anyone has come up with is a photo of noctilucent clouds. No one on here has disproved chemtrails.

 

[wv62]

Don't fly high enough

I know they don't fly high enough but do they get the same fuel or do airports have seperate tanks for jets and turboprops? If separate tanks then wouldn't anyone wonder why? Wouldn't questions be asked? If it's the same fuel then it's a huge finacial waste putting the chemicals in a turbprop. Talking of huge financial waste, who is paying for all of this? Are all the conspiracy people out there chipping in a couple of quid each to help things along?