This made me smile..

Nothing in your link says Rapist............."for sexually abusing Carroll in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s" In courts Rape is "the Commission of Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse Against an individual by way of Physical Force, or the use of Threats or Drugs." whereas Sexual Abuse is " A Broad Term Encompassing Sexual Contact Without Consent." different from Rape and is as picky as the points you select to say I twist the Truth.
Statutory rape in any other country in the world. :rolleyes:
 
The older sister rang them, then was killed whilst on the line after saying a tank was right next to them shooting at them. The red cross rang back and the 6 year child picked up the phone and begged for help because she was trapped in a wrecked car with the corpses of her dead family.

No, the car had 335 bullet holes. Its not clear how the 6 year old died as the paramedics sent to rescue her were also killed and it took two weeks before any rescuers were able to enter that area without being killed. The IDF did not render help obviously.

If you're going to rant about how the reports are made up you should at least read the report.

"The older sister rang them, then was killed whilst on the line after saying a tank was right next to them shooting at them." You have informed me of something I didn't know and that answers the doubt that I had in reference to the phone call.
The Forensic Architecture was performed almost 4 months after, stories of the IDF shooting a little girl hundreds of times were circulating on the internet well before that and at times still arise. "The IDF did not render help obviously", I agree with that statement but it also must be taken into account that Israel are at War with Hamas and if they suspect any terrorist activity in an area they will not just allow any intervention that could possibly be to assist or aid terrorists. " If you're going to rant about how the reports are made up you should at least read the report." Which Report ? there have been literally hundreds of reports on this subject and thousand of posts on forums and the like, to read them all would be impossible, there are certain posts that I certainly wouldn't waste time reading..........in most cases anything from Al Jazeera Media who are funded by Hamas and Qatar, and very little from the BBC's Media Outlets the same goes for most UK newspapers.
 
Another analysis.

So filly presents Mark's (who the **** is Mark? :rolleyes:) version to counter the versions reported by major outlets — Al Jazeera, the BBC, The Washington Post, and Sky News.
In filly's mind Mark's (who the **** is Mark :rolleyes:) version must be correct.because it fits with filly's confirmation bias. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
So filly presents Mark's (who the **** is Mark? :rolleyes:) version to counter the versions reported by major outlets — Al Jazeera, the BBC, The Washington Post, and Sky News.
In filly's mind Mark's (who the **** is Mark :rolleyes:) version must be correct.because it fits with filly's confirmation bias. :rolleyes:

Like I said, another take. Just as reliable as your take, or Al Jazeera who's journalists are regularly killed for being, err, terrorists on behalf of hamas.
 
" If you're going to rant about how the reports are made up you should at least read the report." Which Report ? there have been literally hundreds of reports on this subject
The report that actually counted the bullet holes that you mentioned. Ie the one I linked to.

Right now you seem to be saying you shouldn't trust the BBC because you get better information directly from other sources, but you didn't get good information from those other sources. Whatever your approach has been it failed you here.
 
Last edited:
Right now you seem to be saying you shouldn't trust the BBC because you get better information directly from other sources
Zero facts. Zero links. Zero corroboration.

Just more pointless, aimless RWR low end drivel.

Meanwhile, all the children murdered at the Iranian school by Trump and his utterly pointless murderous war, have been named.
 
Like I said, another take. Just as reliable as your take, or Al Jazeera who's journalists are regularly killed for being, err, terrorists on behalf of hamas.

Did you listen to the fkng phone call made in her last moments?

Thought not.
 
Right now you seem to be saying you shouldn't trust the BBC because you get better information directly from other sources, but you didn't get good information from those other sources. Whatever your approach has been it failed you here.

Is this the same BBC who document Gazan women and children dying from starvation when in fact in one case it was leukaemia.

 
Despite stacking the Supreme Court with Repuplican nominees, trump can't buy a win these days as...

A Denver-based federal appeals court Tuesday became the fourth to reject ICE’s bid to subject millions of people — most of whom have lived in the U.S. for years and have no criminal records — to the prospect of detention without bond. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the Trump administration’s unprecedented expansion of mass detention relies on an inaccurate reading of decades-old laws that had never been used for the breathtaking scope of the Trump administration’s mass detention effort.
 
Filly's wants us to believe the Israel’s Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) in preference to the version reported by major outlets such as Al Jazeera, the BBC, The Washington Post, and Sky News.

COGAT is an Israeli propaganda machine, probably headed up by Mark (who the **** is Mark) :rolleyes:

There are reliable reposts that over 100 children have died of malnutrition in Gaza and over 37,000 breastfeeding women are suffering severe malnutrition.
But all of that is thrown into doubt because Filly has found a report by an Israeli propaganda machine that disputes one of the deaths. :rolleyes:
Has the man no shame?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top