More allegations against Farage

[King Billy]

Answer is, no, suspension should not be an option. If you are a corrupt, lying politician, you should be banned. The country, and the world, would be better for it.

Amen to that!
Uk has much to learn from other countries;

Corruption and Fraud Bans: In places like France, politicians convicted of certain corruption or embezzlement charges face automatic bans from standing for public office. For example, a French court handed far-right leader Marine Le Pen an immediate five-year ban from public office following an embezzlement conviction. In Thailand, dozens of politicians have faced lifetime bans from politics over severe ethical breaches.

 

[morqthana]

Then put up or shut up and find them and post them.

I don't have to, because I never said that you did use them.

There is absolutely no way that any logical and reasoned analysis of this:

Can we please keep the replies free of --fuhrer, garbage. fromarge, brexshit, orange , orangina, deform, MAGA and Margaret fecking Thatcher.

And "the immigration problem", "unvetted foreigners invading us", "We should not have a foreigner as PM"... ?

shows that I was saying you used them.

You were asking the other day what is a troll, you have just given a master class on being one.

So is your definition of "troll", today, "someone who will not let me blather them into silence and who honestly and reasonably responds to my posts"?

 

[ellal]

I hate to say rejoin the EU. However that is not possible so only way is to scrap the ECHR and go from there. I was a big believer in Rwanda and still am.

So you want things to get even worse then...

Oh and btw...

Leaving the ECHR wouldn't solve anything...

And it would simply put the UK further down the list of countries to be ignored!

Unless of course you could give us a clue as to how exactly your plan would work in practice...

You know, short of gunning down the small boats...

And where would you deport people to when the UK itself becomes a pariah nation upon your suggestion?

 

[noseall]

You are trying to skirt around the fact that this situation is entirely of his own making.

The UK, RWR can not see that. Seriously.

And these mórons people intend voting for this comedic shower of shít, throw-backs.

 

[Highway Man]

So you want things to get even worse then...

Oh and btw...

Leaving the ECHR wouldn't solve anything...

And it would simply put the UK further down the list of countries to be ignored!

Unless of course you could give us a clue as to how exactly your plan would work in practice...

You know, short of gunning down the small boats...

And where would you deport people to when the UK itself becomes a pariah nation upon your suggestion?

Rwanda

 

[noseall]

"take back control..."

Untitled

• noseall
• 17 Jan 2015
• 3

 

[ellal]

Rwanda

Really?

How's that going to actually work in practice?

Do you want to see a UK version of ICE?

 

[Highway Man]

Really?

How's that going to actually work in practice?

Do you want to see a UK version of ICE?

Well something needs to be done, you have said yourself we can't send them back to where they came from without an agreement. Therefore it is an alternative

 

[ellal]

Well something needs to be done, you have said yourself we can't send them back to where they came from without an agreement. Therefore it is an alternative

Nope, you haven't answered the question...
Let's try again shall we...

How's that going to actually work in practice?

Do you want to see a UK version of ICE?

Just like garbage you spout rubbish with no clue as to the practicalities of implementation...

Do you want to see an armed militia on the streets of the UK killing people who object to random deportations without due process?

Yes or no?

And btw, an agreement is far more preferable and in the economic interest

 

[Highway Man]

Nope, you haven't answered the question...
Let's try again shall we...

How's that going to actually work in practice?

Do you want to see a UK version of ICE?

Just like garbage you spout rubbish with no clue as to the practicalities of implementation...

Do you want to see an armed militia on the streets of the UK killing people who object to random deportations without due process?

Yes or no?

And btw, an agreement is far more preferable and in the economic interest

Your getting carried away now, for that reason I am out

 

[King Billy]

And where would you deport people to when the UK itself becomes a pariah nation upon your suggestion?

"Aaah", I can hear them saying, "we hadn't thought of that".

 

[Brigadier]

Can we please keep the replies free of --fuhrer, garbage. fromarge, brexshit, orange , orangina, deform, MAGA and Margaret fecking Thatcher

No, because fromage has done nothing to expect common decency, and a lot to expect derision and mockery.

As for the rest of it, they're questions which can easily be answered with a quick Google.
Given that you haven't, I can only surmise you are looking to argue the toss.

 

[ellal]

Your getting carried away now, for that reason I am out

Well no surprise there...

When the questions about practicalities get a tad too awkward, guess who realises that the answers don't exist!

Just like garbage and deform, it's all smoke and mirrors with you!

 

[aveatry]

No, because fromage has done nothing to expect common decency, and a lot to expect derision and mockery.

As for the rest of it, they're questions which can easily be answered with a quick Google.
Given that you haven't, I can only surmise you are looking to argue the toss.

Another one unable to answer.
I did Google and could not find the full answers, my questions were based on my understanding of what I found out.
So as no one wants to answer I can assume that I have got it right.
If he gets suspended for more than 10 days it's then up to 10% if his constituency to force a by-election.
If 10% don't say so then he gos straight back to parliament after 11 days.
Or there could be a by election and he wins which will make him even stronger and he can forever point at how they tried to shut him diwn.
Or if he looses then reform will collapse and a restore will grab all the votes. Which will be an even worse scenario for the left.
There does not seem to be a scenario where any of this benefits the left.

 

[Brigadier]

Another one unable to answer.
I did Google and could not find the full answers, my questions were based on my understanding of what I found out.
So as no one wants to answer I can assume that I have got it right.
If he gets suspended for more than 10 days it's then up to 10% if his constituency to force a by-election.
If 10% don't say so then he gos straight back to parliament after 11 days.
Or there could be a by election and he wins which will make him even stronger and he can forever point at how they tried to shut him diwn.
Or if he looses then reform will collapse and a restore will grab all the votes. Which will be an even worse scenario for the left.
There does not seem to be a scenario where any of this benefits the left.

He's a thin - skinned w@nker, who is going to throw a huge titty-babby at some point.

And when he does, I'll be loving it