Ann Widdecombe

But you have no recognised expertise in that area, so "good enough for you" is not likely to be good enough for any rational person who cares about truth, evidence, accuracy, etc.
Says who?
Plus from your POV I would say that it is unwise for you to attempt to go through life making important judgements about people based on a totally flawed analysis of their superficial appearance.
I used to profile people for a living
No, you really don't.
OMG really?
Firstly, as has been observed, Dave Myers looked a lot like that, and he was not a political activist, so we can see that your test based on appearance has very poor sensitivity.

Secondly, the other photos I posted were all of political activists, and none of them looked a bit like #1. Se we can see that your test also has very poor specificity.

As I said, totally flawed.
According to you yes. However I am the expert and the Judge here so I am afraid it is your judgement that is flawed.
 
Except it isn't "judgement". Your test objectively scores very badly for sensitivity and specificity.
 
Back
Top