I did - but I put it in quotes, which (to me, but probably not you!) meant that I was using the phrase in a technically incorrect manner. Looking back, I did you similar phraselogy previous to that and, to be clear correct, I probably should have written something like "initial period of energy usage', thereby making it clear that I was talking not only about power, but also how long that power had to be drawn in the 'post switch-on period' (to achieved the desired amount of heating).Ah, fair enough. However, you did say it first:
However, as before, I think we are agreed - that if the traditional diversity calculation were not appropriate, despite the power of the ring being similar, then the only reason could be that the 'full power' had to be drawn for a longer period after switch-on with the induction hob (to achieve the same result) - which to my mind would mean that the induction ring were 'less efficient' (took longer to heat things up with the same power) - which we are told isn't the case.
Kind Regards, John