“Christ is king”

If you posted it I’d have given it a chance.

The content of the article would be the same no matter who posted it. If you're saying that you would regard it differently if someone different had posted it then that is a classic ad hominem fallacy.


But all odds does is post about the naughty Jews

There's nothing in here about "the naughty Jews".
 
I agree with much of that. The hatred from many of the Muslims who surround Israel is obvious.

Indeed.

But if we are to have any chance of defusing that then one of the things we need is an honest discussion about the extent to which that hatred is a millennia-long Islam vs Judaism religious hatred, how much is down to the way that Israel behaves, and how much has been taught to them by Europeans, who have a much longer, much more widespread, and much more extreme history of antisemitism.







Then there are those on the far left who call themselves anti-Zionists, many of whom honestly are just opposing Israeli excesses, but some of whom cross over into anti-Semitism.

A problem made harder to deal with by those who deny that separation and argue that everything is antisemitism.
 
Exactly this.. a pattern of behaviour

I still can't get my head round this. Say you reported Odds to the police and they asked you what you were complaining about:

PC: 'What exactly do you believe is anti-Semitic in this article'

MBK: 'Nothing, really. It is a non-partisan factual article highlighting the resurgence of anti-Semitism in the USA, especially on the Christian right'

PC: 'Does it glorify or promote anti-Semitism in any way'

MBK: 'No, the opposite'

PC: 'Does it criticise Jews or Israel or say anything bad about them in any way at all'

MBK: 'No, nothing like that'

PC: 'So, why have you reported the person who posted the article.'

MBK: 'I believe he has made anti-Semitic comments in the past.'

PC: 'Mmm...'
 
I still can't get my head round this. Say you reported Odds to the police and they asked you what you were complaining about:

PC: 'What exactly do you believe is anti-Semitic in this article'

MBK: 'Nothing, really. It is a non-partisan factual article highlighting the resurgence of anti-Semitism in the USA, especially on the Christian right'

PC: 'Does it glorify or promote anti-Semitism in any way'

MBK: 'No, the opposite'

PC: 'Does it criticise Jews or Israel or say anything bad about them in any way at all'

MBK: 'No, nothing like that'

PC: 'So, why have you reported the person who posted the article.'

MBK: 'I believe he has made anti-Semitic comments in the past.'

PC: 'Mmm...'
:LOL:

You really are a daft brush.

Post 8 gives the game away.
 
Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.
Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.

Feel free to provide details on which one it does.
 
Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.
so you decided to reinstate it, because you should have the right to overrule the moderators?

In post 8. You invite people to report it. why?
Feel free to provide details on which one it does.

1a, 1c, 1d, 5, 8, - But mainly 12
 
Last edited:
Read it.

Then...


...report it.


Read it what for ???

You have found spiritual enlightenment ?? In religion ??? The meaning of life ?? I think therefore I am ??? Type of caper ?

You a Catholic than ??
 
Read it what for ???

You have found spiritual enlightenment ?? In religion ??? The meaning of life ?? I think therefore I am ??? Type of caper ?

You a Catholic than ??

It's really interesting.

It looks at whether the USA might become an anti-Semitic Christian theocracy.
 
Back
Top