“Christ is king”

[morqthana]

same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

ABOUT it.

Not CONTAINING it.

If posts mentioning that there is such a thing as antisemitism are to be deleted where does that leave you, Elsa TLC, and fillyboy?

 

[morqthana]

so you decided to reinstate it, because you should have the right to overrule the moderators?

In post 8. You invite people to report it. why?


1a, 1c, 1d, 5, 8, - But mainly 12

1a) Abusive or unhelpful posts are not welcome on this site and are always removed!

What's unhelpful about the article published by the Associated Press? Please highlight any parts of it which you think are that. NB - you just deciding that you find an article warning of the danger of growing antisemitism in the evangelical Christian American right, and criticising specific people for antisemitic comments, 'unhelpful' is what that rule is meant to trap.

1c) Posts which seek to bully or otherwise target individual members (or ad hominem comments) may be removed without warning.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any bullying or targeting of individual members.

But there has (unsurprisingly) been targeting of Odds, and ad-hom attacks on him.


1d) Any comments concerning forum administration or moderation should be addressed to [email protected] and not raised within posts.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any comments concerning forum administration or moderation.


5) Please do not duplicate your posts (includes other forums).

Where is/are the duplicate(s)?


8 ) Please do not resurrect old threads. Start a new thread if you have a similar query.

This is a new thread.


12) Please do not post to repeat material already deemed inappropriate.

Post in thread '“Christ is king”'

Today at 6:35 PM

Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.

Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.

Feel free to provide details on which one it does.

• Odds

 

[morqthana]

Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual somewhat. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.

It’s a pattern of behaviour.

Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.

So what then is your view of all the posts from fillyboy about how people hate Jews? Are they intended to stir hatred against Jews?

 

[morqthana]

But why is it being reported.

Isn't it just flagging up an interesting development on the Christian far right in the USA.

No and no

"No and no"?

You may not find the increasing antisemitism in the Christian far right in the USA "interesting", but how can you credibly deny that flagging it is what the article is doing?

 

[motorbiking]

1a) Abusive or unhelpful posts are not welcome on this site and are always removed!

What's unhelpful about the article published by the Associated Press? Please highlight any parts of it which you think are that. NB - you just deciding that you find an article warning of the danger of growing antisemitism in the evangelical Christian American right, and criticising specific people for antisemitic comments, 'unhelpful' is what that rule is meant to trap.

1c) Posts which seek to bully or otherwise target individual members (or ad hominem comments) may be removed without warning.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any bullying or targeting of individual members.

But there has (unsurprisingly) been targeting of Odds, and ad-hom attacks on him.


1d) Any comments concerning forum administration or moderation should be addressed to [email protected] and not raised within posts.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any comments concerning forum administration or moderation.


5) Please do not duplicate your posts (includes other forums).

Where is/are the duplicate(s)?


8 ) Please do not resurrect old threads. Start a new thread if you have a similar query.

This is a new thread.


12) Please do not post to repeat material already deemed inappropriate.

Post in thread '“Christ is king”'

Today at 6:35 PM

Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.

Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.

Feel free to provide details on which one it does.

• Odds

rule 12

post 8

end of discussion

 

[Highway Man]

rule 12

post 8

end of discussion

Spot on.

 

[morqthana]

Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.

Please present a credible explanation, argued intelligently and with reasoning, of how an article warning of increasing antisemitism, and criticising people for making antisemitic comments is intended to promote hatred of Jews.

 

[morqthana]

Don't worry, I'm sure the morals of MBK and Dec27 have motivated them to report the islamophobic comment.

Or maybe not.

There isn't any in the AP article.

Nor any antisemitic content.

I suppose one might argue that there is anti-fundamental-Christianity content in it?

 

[morqthana]

Posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a weird way of stirring hatred against Jews.

I disagree and in any case you are unable to see the big picture

Well if you disagree with that you must agree with the converse - that's the way logic works, and I'm assuming that you're a logical person.

So therefore you must agree that posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a sensible way of stirring hatred against Jews.

Can you explain your reasoning?

If I wanted to stir up hatred against, say, people with ginger hair, I don't think I'd try to do it by posting an article warning of the dangers of stirring up hatred of people with ginger hair....

 

[Highway Man]

Well if you disagree with that you must agree with the converse - that's the way logic works, and I'm assuming that you're a logical person.

So therefore you must agree that posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a sensible way of stirring hatred against Jews.

Can you explain your reasoning?

This has been all day and night now from you and your other, please just accept that you are wrong and move on as this is really dull.

 

[morqthana]

rule 12

post 8

end of discussion

So is that recognition that 5 out of the 6 grounds you quoted were without merit?

 

[morqthana]

This has been all day and night now from you and your other,

I don't have an "other". STOP LYING.

 

[MNW67]

If I wanted to stir up hatred against, say, people with ginger hair, I don't think I'd try to do it by posting an article warning of the dangers of stirring up hatred of people with ginger hair....

I've got a funny feeling that many posters either didn't read or didn't understand the article.

 

[Highway Man]

I don't have an "other". STOP LYING.

We will address him as your plus 1 then.

 

[morqthana]

I've got a funny feeling that many posters either didn't read or didn't understand the article.

I've got a funny feeling that many posters are so in love with the MAGA right-wing project that they are desperate to suppress anything which shows that it has a problem with antisemitism.

Just as we saw with the reactions to Nigel Farage's history, nothing, not even hatred of Jews, can be allowed to stand in the way of their right-wing ideology.