“Christ is king”

[MNW67]

I've got a funny feeling that many posters are so in love with the MAGA right-wing project that they are desperate to suppress anything which shows that it has a problem with antisemitism.

Just as we saw with the reactions to Nigel Farage's history, nothing, not even hatred of Jews, can be allowed to stand in the way of their right-wing ideology.

I honestly hadn't thought of that and just assumed they either hadn't read or understood the article.

 

[transam]

I've got a funny feeling that many posters either didn't read or didn't understand the article.

I am in the did not read it camp

 

[fillyboy]

The insidious and despicable thing about Odds and many other posters on here is that they emphatically deny being antisemitic. They are merely anti zionist or anti Israel.
I'm personally OK with that, but when that anti Israel/zionist message is pumped multiple times on a daily basis with new thread after new thread with hundreds of posts you have to start to question the motivation behind it. Surely that is to promote hatred.

Another insidious deceitful poster is MNW, he plays the game. I recall Odds posted something worthy of a three year stretch and MNW quite rightly stated he wasn't 'comfortable' with the post, it involved gas chambers or the holocaust, Odds quickly deleted it (or the MODS did as they often are forced to with Odds to protect the site from legal action) but since then MNW seems to have shifted his alliance toward Odds and the various Himmys.

Look, if you hate Jews, that's fine, they're used to it and actually laugh about it, BUT, at least be man enough to grow a pair of balls and admit that you're Jew haters, stop being little girlys and hiding behind the anti war/zionism/Israel ****.

Just grow a pair and admit that you hate Jews. You're not alone, and between you and me, the Jews don't give a s**t, they're used to it, unlike ' 'your lot'.

 

[pete01]

Why would they hate Jews?

 

[morqthana]

Don’t even know what MAGA is tbh

 

[MNW67]

The insidious and despicable thing about Odds and many other posters on here is that they emphatically deny being antisemitic. They are merely anti zionist or anti Israel.
I'm personally OK with that, but when that anti Israel/zionist message is pumped multiple times on a daily basis with new thread after new thread with hundreds of posts you have to start to question the motivation behind it. Surely that is to promote hatred.

Another insidious deceitful poster is MNW, he plays the game. I recall Odds posted something worthy of a three year stretch and MNW quite rightly stated he wasn't 'comfortable' with the post, it involved gas chambers or the holocaust, Odds quickly deleted it (or the MODS did as they often are forced to with Odds to protect the site from legal action) but since then MNW seems to have shifted his alliance toward Odds and the various Himmys.

Look, if you hate Jews, that's fine, they're used to it and actually laugh about it, BUT, at least be man enough to grow a pair of balls and admit that you're Jew haters, stop being little girlys and hiding behind the anti war/zionism/Israel ****.

Just grow a pair and admit that you hate Jews. You're not alone, and between you and me, the Jews don't give a s**t, they're used to it, unlike ' 'your lot'.

You really are a silly one eyed fella sometimes.

For a long time, I have avoided reading any of the yawn threads about Israel, anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism because I find both sides of that argument tedious, unwinnable and never ending. But this thread seemed to be about Christianity, so I had a look. I found it was an interesting but anodyne article which, amongst things, warned about the resurgence of anti-Semitism on the far right and the Christian right in the USA. I was then bemused to find that an article warning about the resurgence of anti-Semitism had been reported by so many posters. All I have been asking is why it was reported. Surely, articles warning about the resurgence of anti-Semitism should be encouraged.

The article wasn't in Al Jazeera. It wasn't even in the Guardian or on the BBC. It was in the religious affairs section of the Associated Press. It wasn't in any way controversial. The only criticism I would have is that it was rather staid and fact heavy.

Instead of insulting me, it would be much more productive if you, or anyone else who has an issue with the article, could actually explain which bit or bits they found offensive.

 

[King Billy]

Never mentioned murdering anyone.
Reported

I would be the judge and executioner if anyone took my tools and I either caught them at it or caught up with them. I wouldn't bother with the police or courts to deal with them, live by the sword and die by the sword.

You said: "live by the sword and die by the sword." that you would kill someone for committing theft.
You also said that you wouldn't bother reporting it to the police, nor bother with any court judgement, that you'd carry out your own punishment on the perpetrator.
What other possible meaning could be put on your "live by the sword and die by the sword" comment?

 

[King Billy]

He doesnt say anything that needs reporting that is the difference. You need reporting making false allegations about people.

He's a lying deceitful abuser.
But I wouldn't report him for that. I'd prefer to reason with him, and leave the rest of the forum to make up their own minds about him.
Many, like you will resort to the tribal tactic, and defend your enemy's enemy, even if they're very wrong. You've demonstrated such a tactic many times over.

 

[King Billy]

Deleted duplicate.

 

[MNW67]

Why would they hate Jews?

I like Jews and I have always supported Israel.

Which is why I was asking why an article warning about the rise of Jew hatred in the USA was reported by so many posters. I am perplexed why my question seems to have upset so many on here.

 

[King Billy]

Where did I claim that ?

So now you are admitting that you've never complained about any anti-Semitic comments being posted in this forum?
Can you confirm that, please?

I read it last time. I’m not being part of @Odds and his ridiculous Jew bashing threads.

 

[King Billy]

If you look into a bit, it’s clear it’s also used in an antisemitic way too.

Odds knows what he’s doing

Have you read it yet?
If you have, then you can easily copy and paste any excerpt that yuopu think is anti-Semitic.
If you can't. it proves that either it's not anti-Semitic, or you've not read it. My guess is that both are proven.

 

[King Billy]

This has been going on since early this morning, you are trolling people and ruining threads with your allegations and trolling.
Reported

You've reported posts that you disagree with, rather than engaging in intelligent discussion?
That is a) exploiting the fact that mods are too busy to verify your reported posts deserve to be deleted, b) indicates your vexatious and vindictive behaviour, and c) suggests you don't have the intellectual capacity for intelligent discussion.

 

[King Billy]

You do enjoy speaking for the forum.

All our posts are posted in the forum, for the forum to read them. It's up to individuals to decide if they want to read them , or get involved in the discussion. I don't speak for the forum, I speak to the forum.
I have no authority, nor any mechanism to speak for the forum. And clearly I don't speak for you, nor HWM, nor Blup, nor MNW67, nor morqthana, nor Odds, so your post is evidently not true.

 

[King Billy]

Billy isn’t as smart as odds. Odds knows exactly what’s happening

You clearly don't because you claim that there has been anti-Semitic comments posted in the forum, but you're unable to repost them because you claim they've been deleted.
Yet when you report another of Odds posts because it offends you, you're unable to explain why it offends you, and you're unable to post any excerpt from those posts that you find offensive.
It was your perfect opportunity to prove your claim, yet you refuse to take it.

Don't you think that's very bizarre?

Perhaps HWM or MBK can explain why they reported it:

Done …Again.

Reported, @Odds will you ever learn?

Reported.
You never learn. Anyone else would get a ban for the rubbish you post.

Although HWM has no idea why he reported it, because he openly admits he only reported it because Odds posted it.
That's even more bizarre.

You only have to look who the messenger is.

It would seem that you reported it because you thought it was rubbish. In which case all your posts, claims, accusations and lies should be reported.