“Christ is king”

[King Billy]

Odds drew him in this morning, notice who is still carrying on, Odds has sat back after pulling the pin.

You, Dec2¼, MBK, MNW67, and maybe others.

 

[MNW67]

I hope this doesn't upset the snowflakes:

 

[King Billy]

4. Some extremist anti-Zionist spaces

In some online spaces strongly opposed to the state of Israel, the phrase occasionally appears alongside antisemitic stereotypes. These users sometimes claim they are only criticizing Zionism, but critics argue that the rhetoric sometimes crosses into hostility toward Jewish people generally.


There’s where @Odds head is

You've quoted this before, yesterday, (see below), but you refused to say where you sourced it from, despite being asked.
Until you do, it's just something that you made up, and nothing to do with Odds. It's from your head, not his.

In some online spaces strongly opposed to the state of Israel, the phrase occasionally appears alongside antisemitic stereotypes. These users sometimes claim they are only criticizing Zionism, but critics argue that the rhetoric sometimes crosses into hostility toward Jewish people generally.

Hmmmmm, that sounds familiar……

 

[Dec27]

You've quoted this before, yesterday, (see below), but you refused to say where you sourced it from, despite being asked.
Until you do, it's just something that you made up, and nothing to do with Odds. It's from your head, not his.

If you say so

 

[King Billy]

Well, this forum is to discuss & debate non-DIY topics - it says so here:

View attachment 409658

So within the context of the rules: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/forum-rules-general-info.19448/

it's quite reasonable to ask you what you thought was/were the rule(s) which Odds transgressed by posting the topic for debate.

Same applies to motorbiking and Highway Man.

Dec2¼ can't explain why he reported Odds' post, becasue he didn't even read it.
MBK knee jerk reaction was to also report it, and later admitted it wasn't anti-Semitic per se, but claimed that Odds is anti-Semitic which justified MBK reporting it.
HWM also admitted reporting it for the simple reason Odds posted it.
I do hope that the Mods are taking note of Dec2¼, MBK and HWM exploiting the workload of the Mods by reporting posts from people they disagree with, in the knowledge that Mods have admitted that they are too busy to verify if reported posts deserve any action, so they just delete them.

It also illustrates how some posters report posts that they don't like based on some flimsy excuse that someone else had reported it. And they have no idea if the post contravenes any rules because they hadn't read it.

No wonder such posters support such extreme governments as authoritarianism.

I hope the forum takes note of their disgusting methods used by some posters, of shutting down any posts they dislike.

 

[Highway Man]

Dec2¼ can't explain why he reported Odds' post, becasue he didn't even read it.
MBK knee jerk reaction was to also report it, and later admitted it wasn't anti-Semitic per se, but claimed that Odds is anti-Semitic which justified MBK reporting it.
HWM also admitted reporting it for the simple reason Odds posted it.
I do hope that the Mods are taking note of Dec2¼, MBK and HWM exploiting the workload of the Mods by reporting posts from people they disagree with, in the knowledge that Mods have admitted that they are too busy to verify if reported posts deserve any action, so they just delete them.

It also illustrates how some posters report posts that they don't like based on some flimsy excuse that someone else had reported it. And they have no idea if the post contravenes any rules because they hadn't read it.

No wonder such posters support such extreme governments as authoritarianism.

I hope the forum takes note of their disgusting methods used by some posters, of shutting down any posts they dislike.

Reported

 

[Dec27]

1. Political figures posting it on social media


Some conservative politicians and activists posted “Christ is King” on social media during political debates. Critics said the posts sometimes appeared right after arguments about Jewish groups or Israel, which made people question the intent.





Supporters said they were just expressing Christian faith, while critics argued it could function as a dog whistle in certain contexts.


2. The Candace Owens controversy


In 2024, commentator Candace Owens repeatedly posted “Christ is King” online during disputes involving Jewish commentators and debates about Israel.





Some critics said she was using the phrase to antagonize Jewish critics, while she insisted she was simply affirming her Christianity.

The dispute became big enough that it spilled into arguments with conservative media figures at The Daily Wire.


3. Online meme campaigns


Around the same period, researchers from the Network Contagion Research Institute linked spikes in the phrase to coordinated online meme activity where users spammed “Christ is King” under posts by Jewish public figures.





The researchers said some posts included antisemitic imagery or conspiracies, which is why they flagged it.


4. The divide inside the political right

The issue also highlighted a split among conservatives:

• Some pro-Israel conservatives argued the phrase was being weaponized by fringe antisemitic groups.
• Others argued the criticism was an attempt to police Christian speech.

 

[Dec27]

Dec2¼ can't explain why he reported Odds' post, becasue he didn't even read it.
MBK knee jerk reaction was to also report it, and later admitted it wasn't anti-Semitic per se, but claimed that Odds is anti-Semitic which justified MBK reporting it.
HWM also admitted reporting it for the simple reason Odds posted it.
I do hope that the Mods are taking note of Dec2¼, MBK and HWM exploiting the workload of the Mods by reporting posts from people they disagree with, in the knowledge that Mods have admitted that they are too busy to verify if reported posts deserve any action, so they just delete them.

It also illustrates how some posters report posts that they don't like based on some flimsy excuse that someone else had reported it. And they have no idea if the post contravenes any rules because they hadn't read it.

No wonder such posters support such extreme governments as authoritarianism.

I hope the forum takes note of their disgusting methods used by some posters, of shutting down any posts they dislike.

Talking to your other user name is beyond pathetic!!

Jog on you plum

 

[Dec27]

Reported

Did you read it lol

 

[motorbiking]

You really are a silly one eyed fella sometimes.

For a long time, I have avoided reading any of the yawn threads about Israel, anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism because I find both sides of that argument tedious, unwinnable and never ending. But this thread seemed to be about Christianity, so I had a look. I found it was an interesting but anodyne article which, amongst things, warned about the resurgence of anti-Semitism on the far right and the Christian right in the USA. I was then bemused to find that an article warning about the resurgence of anti-Semitism had been reported by so many posters. All I have been asking is why it was reported. Surely, articles warning about the resurgence of anti-Semitism should be encouraged.

The article wasn't in Al Jazeera. It wasn't even in the Guardian or on the BBC. It was in the religious affairs section of the Associated Press. It wasn't in any way controversial. The only criticism I would have is that it was rather staid and fact heavy.

Instead of insulting me, it would be much more productive if you, or anyone else who has an issue with the article, could actually explain which bit or bits they found offensive.

Filly answered this in his earlier post. Maybe read it again?

 

[King Billy]

I appreciate that. Odds has a track record. He’s intention's aren’t pure.

You've based your opinion of Odds on your claim that he has posted anti-Semitic comemnts, but you've totally failed to produce any evidence.
And when you report another of his posts, that offends you, you refuse to explain why or how it offends you, and you refuse to take the opportunity to produce any evidence, that you claim exits in that post.
You're a thoroughly disgusting individual who accuses another poster of heinous offences, but you're either unable to explain why, nor to produce any evidence, or given the opportunity to do so, you refuse to take it.

And you've still not read the article posted by Odds.

 

[Dec27]

And you've still not read the article posted by Odds.

If you say so. You do make me chuckle

 

[motorbiking]

I hope this doesn't upset the snowflakes:

View attachment 409705

But it was your intention?

 

[King Billy]

It’s weird how two posters care so much and in a very similar way about something so trivial.

Three, you, MBK and HWM, and two of those don't know why they reported Odds' post, and third couldn't find anything offensive in it after he'd read it.

 

[Dec27]

Three, you, MBK and HWM, and two of those don't know why they reported Odds' post, and third couldn't find anything offensive in it after he'd read it.

You and the div @morqthana are the same poster. The fact you like each others posts is cute pmsl

I know why I reported, the mods do, but don’t seem to care this time.