“Christ is king”

Exactly this.. a pattern of behaviour

I still can't get my head round this. Say you reported Odds to the police and they asked you what you were complaining about:

PC: 'What exactly do you believe is anti-Semitic in this article'

MBK: 'Nothing, really. It is a non-partisan factual article highlighting the resurgence of anti-Semitism in the USA, especially on the Christian right'

PC: 'Does it glorify or promote anti-Semitism in any way'

MBK: 'No, the opposite'

PC: 'Does it criticise Jews or Israel or say anything bad about them in any way at all'

MBK: 'No, nothing like that'

PC: 'So, why have you reported the person who posted the article.'

MBK: 'I believe he has made anti-Semitic comments in the past.'

PC: 'Mmm...'
 
I still can't get my head round this. Say you reported Odds to the police and they asked you what you were complaining about:

PC: 'What exactly do you believe is anti-Semitic in this article'

MBK: 'Nothing, really. It is a non-partisan factual article highlighting the resurgence of anti-Semitism in the USA, especially on the Christian right'

PC: 'Does it glorify or promote anti-Semitism in any way'

MBK: 'No, the opposite'

PC: 'Does it criticise Jews or Israel or say anything bad about them in any way at all'

MBK: 'No, nothing like that'

PC: 'So, why have you reported the person who posted the article.'

MBK: 'I believe he has made anti-Semitic comments in the past.'

PC: 'Mmm...'
:LOL:

You really are a daft brush.

Post 8 gives the game away.
 
Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.
Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.

Feel free to provide details on which one it does.
 
Nonsense.

The previous thread was deleted without explanation for any reason of how it contravened forum rules.
so you decided to reinstate it, because you should have the right to overrule the moderators?

In post 8. You invite people to report it. why?
Feel free to provide details on which one it does.

1a, 1c, 1d, 5, 8, - But mainly 12
 
Last edited:
Read it what for ???

You have found spiritual enlightenment ?? In religion ??? The meaning of life ?? I think therefore I am ??? Type of caper ?

You a Catholic than ??

It's really interesting.

It looks at whether the USA might become an anti-Semitic Christian theocracy.
 
Load of waffle than ??
same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

Odds decides the mods got it wrong, so he posted it again. Fully expecting it to be reported and deleted (see post 8 ).

I wonder what would happen if another poster posted something, that was deemed inappropriate, deleted by mods and then did it again..
 
Load of waffle than ??

The world is changing very quickly, the USA in particular. Who would have thought they would threaten to invade other NATO allies. The article looks at fractures on the right in the USA, the battle for control of MAGA and the role of Christianity in all of that.
 
The world is changing very quickly, the USA in particular. Who would have thought they would threaten to invade other NATO allies. The article looks at fractures on the right in the USA, the battle for control of MAGA and the role of Christianity in all of that.

Dunno

Don’t believe in all these conspiracy theories

Don’t even know what MAGA is tbh
 
same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

Odds decides the mods got it wrong, so he posted it again. Fully expecting it to be reported and deleted (see post 8 ).

I wonder what would happen if another poster posted something, that was deemed inappropriate, deleted by mods and then did it again..

You've still not managed to explain how a very staid article from the religious affairs section of the Associated Press is in any way controversial.

You have also said that if I had posted it, rather than Odds, you wouldn't have reported it.

Is it because of the thread title. That is all I can think of.
 
Back
Top