“Christ is king”

Load of waffle than ??
same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

Odds decides the mods got it wrong, so he posted it again. Fully expecting it to be reported and deleted (see post 8 ).

I wonder what would happen if another poster posted something, that was deemed inappropriate, deleted by mods and then did it again..
 
Load of waffle than ??

The world is changing very quickly, the USA in particular. Who would have thought they would threaten to invade other NATO allies. The article looks at fractures on the right in the USA, the battle for control of MAGA and the role of Christianity in all of that.
 
The world is changing very quickly, the USA in particular. Who would have thought they would threaten to invade other NATO allies. The article looks at fractures on the right in the USA, the battle for control of MAGA and the role of Christianity in all of that.

Dunno

Don’t believe in all these conspiracy theories

Don’t even know what MAGA is tbh
 
same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

Odds decides the mods got it wrong, so he posted it again. Fully expecting it to be reported and deleted (see post 8 ).

I wonder what would happen if another poster posted something, that was deemed inappropriate, deleted by mods and then did it again..

You've still not managed to explain how a very staid article from the religious affairs section of the Associated Press is in any way controversial.

You have also said that if I had posted it, rather than Odds, you wouldn't have reported it.

Is it because of the thread title. That is all I can think of.
 
It’s not a lie. You post and act the same as at least one other poster.

Why are you unable to understand that my views are really not so rare that it cannot be possible for more than one person to share them?
 
same old load of waffle about jew hate, already reported and already deleted.

ABOUT it.

Not CONTAINING it.

If posts mentioning that there is such a thing as antisemitism are to be deleted where does that leave you, Elsa TLC, and fillyboy?
 
so you decided to reinstate it, because you should have the right to overrule the moderators?

In post 8. You invite people to report it. why?


1a, 1c, 1d, 5, 8, - But mainly 12

1a) Abusive or unhelpful posts are not welcome on this site and are always removed!

What's unhelpful about the article published by the Associated Press? Please highlight any parts of it which you think are that. NB - you just deciding that you find an article warning of the danger of growing antisemitism in the evangelical Christian American right, and criticising specific people for antisemitic comments, 'unhelpful' isn't what that rule is meant to trap.

1c) Posts which seek to bully or otherwise target individual members (or ad hominem comments) may be removed without warning.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any bullying or targeting of individual members.

But there has (unsurprisingly) been targeting of Odds, and ad-hom attacks on him.


1d) Any comments concerning forum administration or moderation should be addressed to [email protected] and not raised within posts.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any comments concerning forum administration or moderation.


5) Please do not duplicate your posts (includes other forums).

Where is/are the duplicate(s)?


8 ) Please do not resurrect old threads. Start a new thread if you have a similar query.

This is a new thread.


12) Please do not post to repeat material already deemed inappropriate.

 
Last edited:
Imagine if all I did was find articles about Hinduism, how people hate them, the bad things they do, how others hate them. All factual somewhat. But let’s say 90% of my posts are on this subject.

It’s a pattern of behaviour.

Its intention is to stir hatred against Hindus.

So what then is your view of all the posts from fillyboy about how people hate Jews? Are they intended to stir hatred against Jews?
 
But why is it being reported.

Isn't it just flagging up an interesting development on the Christian far right in the USA.
No and no

"No and no"?

You may not find the increasing antisemitism in the Christian far right in the USA "interesting", but how can you credibly deny that flagging it is what the article is doing?
 
1a) Abusive or unhelpful posts are not welcome on this site and are always removed!

What's unhelpful about the article published by the Associated Press? Please highlight any parts of it which you think are that. NB - you just deciding that you find an article warning of the danger of growing antisemitism in the evangelical Christian American right, and criticising specific people for antisemitic comments, 'unhelpful' is what that rule is meant to trap.

1c) Posts which seek to bully or otherwise target individual members (or ad hominem comments) may be removed without warning.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any bullying or targeting of individual members.

But there has (unsurprisingly) been targeting of Odds, and ad-hom attacks on him.


1d) Any comments concerning forum administration or moderation should be addressed to [email protected] and not raised within posts.

Odd's OP(s) consisted of nothing but a verbatim quote of the AP article. There can't have been any comments concerning forum administration or moderation.


5) Please do not duplicate your posts (includes other forums).

Where is/are the duplicate(s)?


8 ) Please do not resurrect old threads. Start a new thread if you have a similar query.

This is a new thread.


12) Please do not post to repeat material already deemed inappropriate.

rule 12

post 8

end of discussion
 
Read it, reported it. If you start a thread intended to stir religious hostility or hate and your thread gets deleted, do you think doing it again with even more words will change the situation?

This thread is not a discussion about “zionism” or Christ. It’s yet another thread intended to promote hatred of Jews.

Please present a credible explanation, argued intelligently and with reasoning, of how an article warning of increasing antisemitism, and criticising people for making antisemitic comments is intended to promote hatred of Jews.
 
Don't worry, I'm sure the morals of MBK and Dec27 have motivated them to report the islamophobic comment.

Or maybe not. :rolleyes:

There isn't any in the AP article.

Nor any antisemitic content.

I suppose one might argue that there is anti-fundamental-Christianity content in it?
 
Posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a weird way of stirring hatred against Jews.

I disagree and in any case you are unable to see the big picture

Well if you disagree with that you must agree with the converse - that's the way logic works, and I'm assuming that you're a logical person.

So therefore you must agree that posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a sensible way of stirring hatred against Jews.

Can you explain your reasoning?

If I wanted to stir up hatred against, say, people with ginger hair, I don't think I'd try to do it by posting an article warning of the dangers of stirring up hatred of people with ginger hair....
 
Well if you disagree with that you must agree with the converse - that's the way logic works, and I'm assuming that you're a logical person.

So therefore you must agree that posting an article which condemns anti-Semitism is a sensible way of stirring hatred against Jews.

Can you explain your reasoning?
This has been all day and night now from you and your other, please just accept that you are wrong and move on as this is really dull.
 
Back
Top