- Joined
- 29 Dec 2025
- Messages
- 1,901
- Reaction score
- 99
- Country

Then why bother asking?A slick answer is expected. But not an honest one

Then why bother asking?A slick answer is expected. But not an honest one
I don’t care where you live, or how many user names you’ve got “a new one has appeared I think” I don’t want you banned.As far as I am aware having two usernames is not allowed,
So your accusation, and trying to garner support for your accusation, is as good as accusing another poster of breaking the rules. Obviously with the hope of getting them banned because of your incorrect suspicion.
Similar to aveatry's attempt to have me banned because he'd decided, unilaterally, that anyone who is not in the UK is not allowed to participate.
Even if it were true, either that I was not in UK, or the site does not allow participation from abroad, it's not his decision to make.
For yours and aveatry's interest, UK is not at war. He doesn't have any say on that either.
I'm guessing that if you have such suspicions. that another user has more than one user name, the correct process is to report the post, posted by one or both usernames.
Not to mount a public harassment campaign against both, or more, (or one ) user.
In the hope he’s man enough to justify his lies.Then why bother asking?

It's your faulty radar probably.I don’t care where you live, or how many user names you’ve got “a new one has appeared I think”
Of course you don't, that'll be why the persistent accusations.I don’t want you banned.
I did recognise you as a follower, not a leader. I think you reported Odds posts because others had, and not because you'd read it.I’m only highlighting what others have mentioned previously.
You sound a lot like pete. Some of your comments are exactly what I would expect Pete would say.It just make me laugh how obvious it is. I won’t mention it again

You expect a slick answer, not an honest one?In the hope he’s man enough to justify his lies.
The post in the pic is the “lie” I referenced.You expect a slick answer, not an honest one?
And you immediately accuse him of lying, before he's answered. If you responded to me like that, I wouldn't even give you the satisfaction of notification of receipt of your post. I'd metaphorically bin it.
Have you tried a bit of introspection?
Standard.Trolling another attempt to trash a thread.
nwgs and bod are at least two who would fail that particular test.As far as I am aware having two usernames is not allowed,
So your accusation, and trying to garner support for your accusation, is as good as accusing another poster of breaking the rules. Obviously with the hope of getting them banned because of your incorrect suspicion.
Similar to aveatry's attempt to have me banned because he'd decided, unilaterally, that anyone who is not in the UK is not allowed to participate.
Even if it were true, either that I was not in UK, or the site does not allow participation from abroad, it's not his decision to make.
For yours and aveatry's interest, UK is not at war. He doesn't have any say on that either.
I'm guessing that if you have such suspicions. that another user has more than one user name, the correct process is to report the post, posted by one or both usernames.
Not to mount a public harassment campaign against both, or more, (or one ) user.
ReportedYou sound a lot like pete. Some of your comments are exactly what I would expect Pete would say.
As expected @noseall spouting more baseless lies.Yes you do boyo.
View attachment 409865
Please explain what personal information I’ve been looking for?
A slick answer is expected. But not an honest one
And I’ve reported it “for all the good it will do” out rights lies and slander. But as @noseall has stated-He can say what he likes!!

Revelling that you are not posting from the UK is not personal information.
I am sure the mods and owners would be interested to know if a poster was actually a foreign actor paid to post rubbish and to agitate wherever they can- espicually in a time of war.
Fishback is tapping into an increasingly radicalized generation of Republicans. In December, the conservative Manhattan Institute found that 31 percent of Republicans under 50 identify their own views as racist, and 25 percent say their views are antisemitic. For those over 50, it’s only 4 percent for each. The same survey showed that a majority of Republican men under 50 think that the Holocaust either didn’t happen or was exaggerated.
You’d think with all the effort you put in, you might get a bite. But sadly you never seem to!!Indulge me.
Are you saying that requests for personal info is not prohibited?
Or are you saying that trolling not being allowed was a lie?
Or are you saying that nwgs (Who is he?) has not been persistently attacking whoever it was they were attacking? Or that he wasn't trolling?
Or that it's not good riddance?
Please explain.
Yeah, and as i responded, so why bother asking?
Not really.
It just helps me to ask specific questions to which your answers might clear up your position.

He has learning difficulties, see my post to him in my capital punishment thread, a shame as he seems a nice lad.It was a simple post, if you can’t understand it, that’s not my issue.
No one else has an issue with it.