“Christ is king”

Speaking as an objective and centrist poster who enjoys a proper discussion, I'm a bit disappointed that the interesting and important developments covered in the various articles which have been linked to on this thread have largely been drowned out.

Proper discussion ?????

Blimey your on wrong forum ( lol)

Any way there are more important issues than all this religious / Christ is king / ball cocks

One of which is how come my smiley type icons and the other icon wat sits don’t work when I post ??????
 
the various articles which have been linked to on this thread have largely been drowned out.
Drowned out by a couple of posters harassing others to reveal their location, or which car they drive, which they would then use to harass them even further, as in the case of Notch, and maybe others, (carmenmiranda?, Denso?, maybe others)
Notch eventually revealed his location only to be hounded further about which shops were where on his High Street.
Warey4life, now that he's revealed his location, may have further harassment to come from aveatry.

We currently have at least four dangerous, lying, violent, vindictive posters harassing Morqthana and I, probably after harassing others until they left. Their behaviour can only be explained by their difference of opinion with Morqthana and I. So they conduct a campaign of harassment to shut us down.

1. Johnny-racist-bigot-in-drags, as good as admitted that he's a criminal, applauds his friend's criminality, both of whom are immigrants. Yet the hypocrisy of johnny-racist-bigot-in-drags thinks that foreign criminals should be deported.
He's a violent, volatile and vindictive poster with a limited vocabulary, who is repetitive with his extreme abuse and persistent lies.

2. Dec27 also conducts a campaign of persistent lies, but he's just a follower, accusing others of lying when the idea has been put in his head. And reporting other's posts but he can't explain why, and probably hadn't read them.

3. Highwayman conducts a campaign of lies and abuse trying to find out which car I drive. He's openly admitted to being a convicted violent offender, and he's threatened to murder anyone he suspects of stealing his tools. And he and aveatry want to know where I live and which car I drive. :rolleyes:

4. Then there's aveatry. He's been proven to be an outlandish liar, accusing me of claiming I was a one-handed, house-bound, technophobe, which was a blatant lie. Yet he persists in his concocted hypothesis about me. He continues to harass me to reveal my whereabouts, despite there being no requirement by Admin or Mods. Perhaps with aveatry and Highwayman they want to narrow down their search for my whereabouts. They want to know where I live and what car I drive. I]'ve said numerous times that I will not reveal any of my personal information, and that includes any clues to my identity. Aveatry has form for weaponising others personal information to hound them until they leave because he's incapable of intelligent debate to counter their opinion.
He's also accused me of being a foreign agitator. Perhaps he can present evidence to show my financial influence, or organised online interference to manipulate public opinion, or any propaganda issued by me.
The upshot of it all is that he claimed he could prove that i do not live in UK, and he's never even tried. He relies on Morqthana and I to disprove his baseless hypothesis to prove his hypothesis is true, that's not how it works.
All because he wants to shut down our opinion.

I have in the past been content to debate my opinions openly in the forum and allow the forum to judge the value of mine and others opinions.
But I am considering altering my approach to such harassment and attempts to access my personal information.
Perhaps in future I will not debate with such abusers, liars, violent and volatile offenders, or those who think they can demand my personal information for their continuing harassment. I will simply report their unacceptable conduct. This forum is supposed to be a friendly, welcoming place. With the likes of those four named individuals it's far from it. They make it a hostile unwelcoming place for debate with which they disagree.

He's convinced himself that I'm not in the UK, based on the hours that I keep, and he's conducted a campaign of lies, false accusations and harassment since.
I invite aveatry to demand that diy-fun-UK, or JohnD, or any other Scottish resident, takes the photo that he demands of me. Then he'll be as convinced that they are not in UK, as he is that I'm not. He'll also demonstrate his ignorance of the UK's geographical differences.
He's a thoroughly deceitful and despicable individual whose only tactic is a campaign of ad hominems against his political opponents, because he's incapable of intelligent debate.
 
Last edited:
Trolls gotta troll.
Yes you do boyo.


IMG_7284.jpeg


Please explain what personal information I’ve been looking for?

A slick answer is expected. But not an honest one

And I’ve reported it “for all the good it will do” out rights lies and slander. But as @noseall has stated-He can say what he likes!!
 
Last edited:
...got at least two user names.

Is that not allowed ?
As far as I am aware having two usernames is not allowed,
So your accusation, and trying to garner support for your accusation, is as good as accusing another poster of breaking the rules. Obviously with the hope of getting them banned because of your incorrect suspicion.

Similar to aveatry's attempt to have me banned because he'd decided, unilaterally, that anyone who is not in the UK is not allowed to participate.
Even if it were true, either that I was not in UK, or the site does not allow participation from abroad, it's not his decision to make.
Revelling that you are not posting from the UK is not personal information.
I am sure the mods and owners would be interested to know if a poster was actually a foreign actor paid to post rubbish and to agitate wherever they can- espicually in a time of war.
For yours and aveatry's interest, UK is not at war. He doesn't have any say on that either.

I'm guessing that if you have such suspicions. that another user has more than one user name, the correct process is to report the post, posted by one or both usernames.
Not to mount a public harassment campaign against both, or more, (or one ) user.
 
As far as I am aware having two usernames is not allowed,
So your accusation, and trying to garner support for your accusation, is as good as accusing another poster of breaking the rules. Obviously with the hope of getting them banned because of your incorrect suspicion.

Similar to aveatry's attempt to have me banned because he'd decided, unilaterally, that anyone who is not in the UK is not allowed to participate.
Even if it were true, either that I was not in UK, or the site does not allow participation from abroad, it's not his decision to make.

For yours and aveatry's interest, UK is not at war. He doesn't have any say on that either.

I'm guessing that if you have such suspicions. that another user has more than one user name, the correct process is to report the post, posted by one or both usernames.
Not to mount a public harassment campaign against both, or more, (or one ) user.
I don’t care where you live, or how many user names you’ve got “a new one has appeared I think” I don’t want you banned.

I’m only highlighting what others have mentioned previously.

It just make me laugh how obvious it is. I won’t mention it again
 
I don’t care where you live, or how many user names you’ve got “a new one has appeared I think”
It's your faulty radar probably.

I don’t want you banned.
Of course you don't, that'll be why the persistent accusations. :rolleyes:

I’m only highlighting what others have mentioned previously.
I did recognise you as a follower, not a leader. I think you reported Odds posts because others had, and not because you'd read it.
If you'd read it, you'd have been able to explain exactly why it offended you.

It just make me laugh how obvious it is. I won’t mention it again
You sound a lot like pete. Some of your comments are exactly what I would expect Pete would say.
 
In the hope he’s man enough to justify his lies.
You expect a slick answer, not an honest one?
And you immediately accuse him of lying, before he's answered. If you responded to me like that, I wouldn't even give you the satisfaction of notification of receipt of your post. I'd metaphorically bin it.

Have you tried a bit of introspection?
 
Back
Top