hI,
sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I did not see the message.
If you are still looking for a quote we would be happy to provide one for you. just email me your details to [email protected]
been keeping tabs of this slow simmering topic.
would like to point out that the so called "waste" still contains 95% of the useful energy, we have designs and know ways to reuse this fuel. the final waste would be safe in 300 years(by using up and preventing the forming of transuranics)...
energy companies will always what to keep the same profit or increase it.
all that would happen is the more people saved the faster the price rap up would be.
at the end of the day you would of done all the hard work of cutting back but get charged the same.
also what about industrial...
its very easy to be alarmist and mistrusting
much harder to look at the facts and come to a reliable conclusions which may go against ideology.
nuclear is safe. the worst accident in years years has killed no one and in all likelihood will never do.
the safety bar on nuclear is so high...
to question the safety is Pure FUD tactic. EDR is a evolution of design of an already safe design. one of the things is add extra passive safety measures.
we build more complex things for less money then nuclear reactors.
first off no diet can remove every trace of carbohydrates. so the idea your body would go in hypoglycaemia on a low carb diet is a bit of a straw man.
also when say all sugar I was really mean produced food with high sugar content and starchy foods and not meaning cutting out all food that...