Thanks guys for the info.
With reference to Crafty's points of a TP&N distribution board. But you CAN still have seperate CU's running from a TP&N Distribution board - So no need to get rid of them! Yes, the actual place I was referring to does have a TP&N DB, and obviously with its TP&N isolator, then its easier to work on! , However the reason this installation has seperate CU's is because it is a multi storey building, it makes it easier to work on different floors of the building without having to keep going back to the meter room to isolate independent MCB's. There are 3 consumers already fed from 60A MCB's on the DB, and the rest of the MCB's on the DB are all full of smaller circuits ( mostly local to the meter room and DB) . As the board uses Crabtree C50's , the 60 Amp mcb's are now virtually obsolete , hence looking at the option of adding a Switchfuse (using tails from current splits) to feed a new Consumer in a location (more than 3 meters away!) . Have checked the phase loads with a clamp meter with all circuits maxxed out! and theres plenty of spare current available on all the phases, so not worried about overloads!
Seen as the tails have already been split into Henley blocks, it makes it just as easy as if I had gotten hold of another 60A MCB!
Other than that its a whole new modern distribution board - and a lot of time to swap all the wiring over! - Compared to the addition of a simple Switchfuse and a couple of tails! The latter seems the most cost effective method , especially as I'm the one who'd be footing the bill for it all, and it seems a shame to ditch that Crabtree DB - its been working fine for 20+ years, and never had to replace an MBC in it so far!
Opinions from anyone out there much appreciated. As long as the loads have all been balanced out on the phases, I can't see any harm in the above method of connection!
By the way, please don't quote me 'Notification Required!!' , Building Regulations , Part P etc , I have'nt come on here for a lecture, I am just looking for advice!