A former detective loses

Joined
20 Nov 2009
Messages
39,400
Reaction score
5,192
Location
Surrey
Country
United Kingdom
A £144,000 racism claim, against the IPCC. Carol Howard brought 33 discrimination & harassment claims against the IPCC

The tribunal judge Joanna Wade dismissed each one , saying that Ms Howard had a tendency to accuse employers of prejudice every time she was un-happy with work.
 
Sponsored Links
Judge wade stated that Ms Howard had an "astonishing lack of perspective"

Ms Howard claimed that IPCC was "institutionally racist, and corrupt" Judge Wade said

"We are sad to see the polarisation in the IPCC & that the claimant and her witnesses believe in a toxic atmosphere , which try as we might , we did not detect "

She also brought a case against the IOPC. un-successfully

IOPC's director M.Lockwood said " We maintained through out the tribunal that the accusations were with out foundation"
 
Her previous claim against the Met police was successful and she was awarded £37,000.

The judges comment was based on the assumption that Ms Howard resorts to claims of racism due to her successful previous case.
Judge Joanna Wade said Miss Howard's claims of a "witch hunt" were unfounded and suggested her previous successful action lay behind her new claim.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/la...ward-racism-complaint-discrimination-rejected

So one successful case now justifies the assumption of a pattern of claims, and ergo, those claims must be false?
 
Sponsored Links
"We are sad to see the polarisation in the IPCC & that the claimant and her witnesses believe in a toxic atmosphere , which try as we might , we did not detect"

Their use of the phrase "which try as we might" suggests they were looking for evidence in support of a certain outcome. Are these the actual words used by an actual judge?

Nozzle
 
Their use of the phrase "which try as we might" suggests they were looking for evidence in support of a certain outcome. Are these the actual words used by an actual judge?

Nozzle

apparently so Judge Wade ruled

" we are sad to see the polarisation in the IPCC & that the claimant & her witnesses believe in a toxic atmosphere which
"Try as we might we did not detect"
 
Her previous claim against the Met police was successful and she was awarded £37,000.

The judges comment was based on the assumption that Ms Howard resorts to claims of racism due to her successful previous case.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/la...ward-racism-complaint-discrimination-rejected

So one successful case now justifies the assumption of a pattern of claims, and ergo, those claims must be false?

were did u hear that way r bee ? was it on the radio ? :sneaky:
 
Ms Howard also made 6 previous claims against the Met , including one for £229,000
 
Whilst a detective

THe panel was also told that she had recorded hours of work as an investigater that she had not done. ( time sheet fiddeling ?)


the judge said



" the matter got no further then the investigation stage as she resigned & declined to participate but the evidence was compelling. Her failure to participate was in itself incriminating. This issue was an amply good reason for the decision not to extend her contract"
 
Her previous claim against the Met police was successful and she was awarded £37,000.


Or maybe she thought that was easy I’ll try it again
And again

And again


And again

Maybe you need to give a balanced opinion sometime! But that’s being a lefty you suffer tunnel vision.
 
Employing a female is like putting your neck on the block. If she's non-Caucasian, you've got double trouble.


I’m sure there a good few non Caucasian female officers who are not trouble makers.

Thus woman was out for her own ends and makes trouble for others.

Can’t tar everyone with same brush
 
Yet again a**e end exploits the opportunity to portray a negative image of an ethnic minority.
Before anyone suggests that there is no bigotry in a**e end's post, I agree, there is no bigotry in this post.
It is the persistent pattern of a**e end to exploit any and every opportunity to portray ethnic minorities, Muslims, etc in a negative light.
The story in itself is of little importance, except that it provides a**e end yet again, an opportunity to post a comment, while not containing any bigotry in itself, it adds to the litany of a**e end's posts building up his portfolio of such posts.

While some may dismiss his actions as that of a WUM, it is none-the-less another in the multiplicity of posts portraying others in a negative light.

Some may accuse me of boring others with my challenges against a**e end and his bigoted portrayal of others, yet they fail to grasp the fact that a**e end's persistent dishonesty, misrepresenting of something he heard on the radio, and multiplicity of posts against ethnic minorities, immigrants, Muslims etc, has not only been boring, but has also been, and continues to be offensive.
Yet he is allowed to continue, uncriticised, uncontrolled and unfettered.

While the Sun regularly presents articles criticising Labour, it can be justifiably rated as a pro-conservative newspaper.
Similarly, while the Mirror regularly criticises Tory policy, it can justifiably be rated as a left-wing paper.
Similarly, while a**e end persistently posts articles portraying ethnic minorities, etc, in a negative light, he can justifiably be accused of being bigoted.
 
Or maybe she thought that was easy I’ll try it again
And again

And again


And again

Maybe you need to give a balanced opinion sometime! But that’s being a lefty you suffer tunnel vision.
But did she? Your assumption is rather just that, an assumption possibly employed to cloud the issue:
A former Metropolitan Police officer who won a race discrimination case against the force has accused the Independent Police Complaints Commission of being “institutionally racist and corrupt”
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...rd-sues-watchdog-in-140k-race-claim-7dlfc9pxc

That is one case that she won against the Met police.
Do you know of any others?

Voting UKIP can hardly be a worthwhile claim for having a balanced opinion.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top