A former detective loses

[ReganAndCarter]

I’m sure there a good few non Caucasian female officers who are not trouble makers.

Thus woman was out for her own ends and makes trouble for others.

Can’t tar everyone with same brush

Not saying every one - but there are ways of reducing your chances of ending up being accused of sexual and/or racial discrimination as an employer.

P.S. You'll have the poor, delicate liberal snowflakes on here having a seizure with your use of 'tar brush'.

 

[Bodd]

Yet again a**e end exploits the opportunity to portray a negative image of an ethnic minority.
Before anyone suggests that there is no bigotry in a**e end's post, I agree, there is no bigotry in this post.
It is the persistent pattern of a**e end to exploit any and every opportunity to portray ethnic minorities, Muslims, etc in a negative light.
The story in itself is of little importance, except that it provides a**e end yet again, an opportunity to post a comment, while not containing any bigotry in itself, it adds to the litany of a**e end's posts building up his portfolio of such posts.

While some may dismiss his actions as that of a WUM, it is none-the-less another in the multiplicity of posts portraying others in a negative light.

Some may accuse me of boring others with my challenges against a**e end and his bigoted portrayal of others, yet they fail to grasp the fact that a**e end's persistent dishonesty, misrepresenting of something he heard on the radio, and multiplicity of posts against ethnic minorities, immigrants, Muslims etc, has not only been boring, but has also been, and continues to be offensive.
Yet he is allowed to continue, uncriticised, uncontrolled and unfettered.

While the Sun regularly presents articles criticising Labour, it can be justifiably rated as a pro-conservative newspaper.
Similarly, while the Mirror regularly criticises Tory policy, it can justifiably be rated as a left-wing paper.
Similarly, while a**e end persistently posts articles portraying ethnic minorities, etc, in a negative light, he can justifiably be accused of being bigoted.

This is what is so vile about this Woman she’s using her ethic orrigins and her colour to her advantage that then pits the rest of us against each other.

You need to criticise her as she and her likes are why there is racism.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

P.S. You'll have the poor, delicate liberal snowflakes on here having a seizure with your use of 'tar brush'.

Strange that yet another plumber has used the word 'snowflakes' to describe anyone that dares to object to the tone and content of comments.
Mitch and a**e end have also used the word 'snowflakes'
Now putting that in perspective, we have heard that gossip goes on in the CC forum, and worse.
Perhaps, despite Bodd's, a**e end's and mitch's denial, that gossip has created the word 'snowflakes' to describe those in the GD forum that dare to object to their objectional comments. The word has been carried across from the CC forum, making the denials worthless.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

This is what is so vile about this Woman she’s using her ethic orrigins and her colour to her advantage that then pits the rest of us against each other.

You need to criticise her as she and her likes are why there is racism.

Are you suggesting that she has never suffered from discrimination?
Obviously she has because she has been awarded compensation from the Met for exactly that.

But that is not the real issue. The real issue is a**e end exploiting the opportunity to portray ethnic minorities in a negative way, as per usual.

In addition, and because of his special protection, from being a mod, or from being a member of the CC forum, he sets the endemic tone of the GD forum, aided and assisted by DIYnot. He may do exactly the same in the CC forum, for all we know. It would certainly explain why the vast majority of plumbers that come across to the GD forum are also extreme right-wing.
Does that make his particular brand of bigotry 'institutional?

 

[Bodd]

Are you suggesting that she has never suffered from discrimination?
Obviously she has because she has been awarded compensation from the Met for exactly that.

But that is not the real issue. The real issue is a**e end exploiting the opportunity to portray ethnic minorities in a negative way, as per usual.

In e right-wing.
Does that make his particular brand of bigotry 'institutional?

She may well have done. That is my point. She thought this is a great little earner. I’ll try it again


And again

And again




And again

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

She may well have done. That is my point. She thought this is a great little earner. I’ll try it again


And again

And again




And again

More assumption by you. Bigoted assumption probably.
She had one successful case against the Met, as far as we know.

 

[Notch7]

More assumption by you. Bigoted assumption probably.

Common sense conclusion more like

 

[ReganAndCarter]

Strange that yet another plumber has used the word 'snowflakes' to describe anyone that dares to object to the tone and content of comments.
Mitch and a**e end have also used the word 'snowflakes'
Now putting that in perspective, we have heard that gossip goes on in the CC forum, and worse.
Perhaps, despite Bodd's, a**e end's and mitch's denial, that gossip has created the word 'snowflakes' to describe those in the GD forum that dare to object to their objectional comments. The word has been carried across from the CC forum, making the denials worthless.

You'll get over it flower - until the next opportunity to be offended comes along for you. They're like buses, there'll be another chance to air your pc credentials along in a minute.

 

[Bodd]

My Assumption has good foundation I do believe.

 

[Bodd]

Voting UKIP can hardly be a worthwhile claim for having a balanced opinion.

Voting Ukip on this occasion as a protest vote between 3 party’s tell you nothing.

You do understand what balance is don’t you. ?

 

[transam]

Ms Howards intial job application at the IPCC was rejected with out any interview the tribunal was told. The panel said her logic in claiming "discrimination"
over this was troubling.

"Looking at the poor quality of her application and her lack of relevant skills & experience , it is hard to see how she could have expected to secure this role"

Judge Wade wrote " We describe this incident because it is chronologically the first of many showing the claimant has a poor ability to judge whether a situation is terrible or entirely understandable ounce the content is known"

The IOPC director said " We maintained through out the tribunal that the "accusations" were with out foundation!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[vinty]

I thought there was a law against vexatious litigation, if she had been white would her claims have even been considered.
If these are the sort of people the Met employs to uphold the law is it any wonder law and order has broken down in large parts of London.
If she was caught falsifying time sheets that would constitute fraud so why wasn't she prosecuted.

 

[transam]

Yet again a**e end exploits the opportunity to portray a negative image of an ethnic minority.
Before anyone suggests that there is no bigotry in a**e end's post, I agree, there is no bigotry in this post.
It is the persistent pattern of a**e end to exploit any and every opportunity to portray ethnic minorities, Muslims, etc in a negative light.
The story in itself is of little importance, except that it provides a**e end yet again, an opportunity to post a comment, while not containing any bigotry in itself, it adds to the litany of a**e end's posts building up his portfolio of such posts.

While some may dismiss his actions as that of a WUM, it is none-the-less another in the multiplicity of posts portraying others in a negative light.

Some may accuse me of boring others with my challenges against a**e end and his bigoted portrayal of others, yet they fail to grasp the fact that a**e end's persistent dishonesty, misrepresenting of something he heard on the radio, and multiplicity of posts against ethnic minorities, immigrants, Muslims etc, has not only been boring, but has also been, and continues to be offensive.
Yet he is allowed to continue, uncriticised, uncontrolled and unfettered.

While the Sun regularly presents articles criticising Labour, it can be justifiably rated as a pro-conservative newspaper.
Similarly, while the Mirror regularly criticises Tory policy, it can justifiably be rated as a left-wing paper.
Similarly, while a**e end persistently posts articles portraying ethnic minorities, etc, in a negative light, he can justifiably be accused of being bigoted.

way r bee is on a mission . good for him & long may he continue to stand up & defend the oppressed with his trusty shield of truth & justice.

 

[vinty]

Are you suggesting that she has never suffered from discrimination?
Obviously she has because she has been awarded compensation from the Met for exactly that.

But that is not the real issue. The real issue is a**e end exploiting the opportunity to portray ethnic minorities in a negative way, as per usual.

In addition, and because of his special protection, from being a mod, or from being a member of the CC forum, he sets the endemic tone of the GD forum, aided and assisted by DIYnot. He may do exactly the same in the CC forum, for all we know. It would certainly explain why the vast majority of plumbers that come across to the GD forum are also extreme right-wing.
Does that make his particular brand of bigotry 'institutional?

The Met probably paid out because it was cheaper to do so rather than defend themselves and risk the attendant bad publicity and costs, after all it is only the taxpayers money they are using to pay her off.

 

[transam]

I thought there was a law against vexatious litigation, if she had been white would her claims have even been considered.
If these are the sort of people the Met employs to uphold the law is it any wonder law and order has broken down in large parts of London.
If she was caught falsifying time sheets that would constitute fraud so why wasn't she prosecuted.

when all else fails play the race card how ever to be fair & appease Way r bee

Police sergeant Zaheer Ahmed was over looked for promotion in favour of less qualified white officers because of his ethnic origins

He complained of a number of racially motivated snubs during his 23 year career.

A tribunal found that he was subjected to "unconscious" race discrimination & 2 instances of direct discrimination . The tribunal ruling found that Mr Ahmed had suffered racial discrimination in 7 of the 16 claims he made. He will now receive what could be substantial damages pay out at a hearing.

Mr Ahmed has since retired from the police force.