Advice - First Fix Ring main or Radial?

If one wants to maximise 'versatility' ('future proofing'?), there's no reason why one can't do 'both' (and I often do these days) - i.e. 'loop at rose' AND ALSO run a neutral from rose to switches.
A major advantage of loop at switch over loop at rose comes when someone wants to replace the rose with a fancy fitting. Many fittings are much easier to wire with only a single cable, and metal class 2 fittings may make it essentially impossible to maintain their class 2 status in the face of multiple cables.
 
Ring every time, much more flexible.
I'm personally very much 'on the fence' as regards this one (and install both rings and radials, as seem more appropriate in particular situations).

As a matter of interest, in what sense(s) you feel that rings are "much more flexible"?
 
I'm personally very much 'on the fence' as regards this one (and install both rings and radials, as seem more appropriate in particular situations).

As a matter of interest, in what sense(s) you feel that rings are "much more flexible"?
Adding to the ring, easier to terminate
 
Could you perhaps elaborate? I'm not sure why you feel that 'adding to' or 'terminating' is any easier with a ring than a radial.
2.5mm radial carries less than 2.5 ring. Thinner conductors too
 
Well, its obvious. If you want to plug the same load into the sockets. (for example a kitchen). Then a radial will either need to be 4 or 6mm

And as an the op is more of a DIYer, its a bit silly to have to buy one real of 4mm when you can use 2.5mm on a ring.
I'm sure you investigated 4mm prices in the past, and they weren't good value either, as not a common use
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top