Agricultural Furrows

Joined
18 Feb 2007
Messages
1,410
Reaction score
79
Country
United Kingdom
I have seen in many farmed fields around the UK, regular straight furrows, with am almost sinusoidal cross section, about 20 ft wave length (peak to peak) and about 3 ft height (amplitude). As these undulations are so regular and straight, they must have been man made and they are confined to the field boudaries. I have wondered for many years as to what the function if these furrows is. They must be very useful for some reason as the effort to produce them will be quite considerable.
Has anyone any idea what the function of these furrows are.
I have had some suggestions by various colleages in the past but these have been ideas as opposed to fact. I will not say what these ideas are as they may influence any answers that anyone may have.
 
Yes, to increase the amount of crop that may be grown on the land.
 
Yes, to increase the amount of crop that may be grown on the land.
That certainly makes sense, but the amount of effort involved to produce the undulations seems to be greater than the effective production increase in growing area.
Thanks for the answer 2scoops, I can now pass these fields without the constant thought "What the f*** do they do that for".
 
Most are ancient, hence I guess they didn't have a great deal else to do. The other one I've heard is so that the livestock can shelter from standing water, which I think is very dubious. Whereabouts are you? Ridge and furrow common in N Bucks and Beds, not seen them elsewhere (never saw them in S bucks)

Then again, N Bucks / South Beds not known for its soil (It's awful)
 
To increase drainage, these were always ploughed at right angles to any streams or ditches.
 
Most are ancient, hence I guess they didn't have a great deal else to do. The other one I've heard is so that the livestock can shelter from standing water, which I think is very dubious. Whereabouts are you? Ridge and furrow common in N Bucks and Beds, not seen them elsewhere (never saw them in S bucks)

Then again, N Bucks / South Beds not known for its soil (It's awful)
I'm in Co Durham and I see the furrows quite regularly. One of my colleagues had the same reason for these furrows as yourself, and I must admit my thoughts were that it was wrong as the increased production area would have been minimal. Obviously I am wrong and the effort to produce them must have been worth while. The standing water suggestion seems a good one as it would avoid foot rot. I suppose the increased yield is the favoutite answer.
 
To increase drainage, these were always ploughed at right angles to any streams or ditches.
The furrows I am referring to are of too great a pitch and depth as to have been created with a plough. I say that in relative ignorance. Maybe repeated wide space ploughing over years may get the result.
Some of them I have come across are across the slope of the land and as such would probably not help drainage.
I have had another thought which in fact confuses me a little further.
If these furrows were produced to increase yield per given field area, then I think they would have been produced running North to South so as to Maximise the sun light. This N-S run is not a common characteristic in the furrowed fields I have seen. My confusion continues.
 
In Cheshire they are known as "butts and reans".
As far as i'm aware certainly on the heavy soils around here it was done for drainage, very often there will be old clay drain pipes in the bottom of each one, which will all run to a ditch at the top or bottom of the field. They would probably all of been created by ploughing with horses, depending on how you open the furrow a ridge can be created, it would probably of taken a few years to create what you see today.
The clay drain pipes would all of been dug in by hand.
The ones which remain today are most probably in land which has remained as grassland, modern farm machinery will soon level out the fields if they are in use for arable crops.
In some larger fields they will be different sizes and run in different directions, this is because hedgerows have been removed from small fields to create larger ones. (hope this makes sense)
 
The playing field at the school i went to was as you described. I have no idea how true it is but i was told at the time that these were created in war-time britain when food was scarce and an individual or family would be responsible for growing crops on each 'furrow' thus dividing up available land for each family to grow their own food where otherwise they wouldn't have had a garden. Like i say, i don't know how reliable this source is but as a 12yr old i accepted it!!

Whatever they were for it wasn't for playing Rugby on. How no-one ever injured themselves on that pitch i'll never know!
 
Maintaining the fertility certainly sounds plausible, and would tie in with the poor soil bit. As I said, don't see them in S Bucks, but you do in N bucks, where the soil is very heavy. BTW, I was told that's why MK was sited where it is. On poor agricultural land (might not be true though :wink:)
 
The links from Blondini and Empip suggest similar reasons for the furrowing with medieval connotations. These conclusions would suggest that the dividing up of the land would be adjacent to villages. There are many examples of this furrowing which are remote form established villages. Of course the furrowing could have been done next to a village which no longer exists, and in some cases of such fields I can find no evidence of villages on medieval maps. I think the idea of the spiral ploughing technique is very likely to have produced the ridges and furrows with the 'wavelength' observed. It is certainly a new idea to me as in the past I have rather assumed the increased production area to be the likely reason.
The article from empip would suggest that the Furrowing effect would be predominant adjacent to ALL medieval villages, but I am not sure if this is the case.
Thanks for all the replies to my question, I rather expected I would get none, and the replies so far have given me further thoughts.
Thanks again every one.
Merry Christmas
 
Amazing amount of stuff on this topic :- A few contrary ideas . . .

http://books.google.com/books?lr=&as_brr=3&q=ridges+and+furrows+in+fields&btnG=Search+Books

============

Top man in his . . . field ! Maybe remaining so, RIP.

Medieval England By Maurice Warwick Beresford, John Kenneth Sinclair St. Joseph


From Independent Obituaries
Professor Maurice Beresford

Economic historian and author of 'The Lost Villages of England' who pioneered 'landscape history'

Saturday, 14 January 2006

Maurice Warwick Beresford, economic historian: born Sutton Coldfield, Warwickshire 6 February 1920; Lecturer, Leeds University 1948-55, Reader 1955-59, Professor of Economic History 1959-85 (Emeritus), Dean 1958-60, Chairman, School of Economics Studies 1965-68, 1971-72, 1981-83, Chairman of Faculty Board 1968-70; FBA 1985; died Leeds 15 December 2005.


Maurice Beresford was one of the foremost medieval economic historians of the second half of the 20th century and a pioneer of what is now called Landscape History.

An only child, Beresford was born in Sutton Coldfield in 1920. After Bishop Vesey's Grammar School, where his interests in history, geography and literature were developed, he went up to Jesus College, Cambridge, in 1939 to read History. Already left-wing and from 1939 a conscientious objector, he often said that he never felt at home among what he called the "hearties and the rowing brigade" of the college. Only in recent years did his views about his college mellow; surprisingly, a year or two ago he even attended a reunion dinner.

His unease did not stop him, however, from getting a First in Prelims, as a result of which he was invited to participate in an economic history seminar run by John Saltmarsh, Fellow of King's. This was to have a lasting influence upon his academic life, for Saltmarsh was one of the few historians at the time interested not only in documentary sources but in visible remains in the landscape. Beresford recalled that Saltmarsh took the group on a walk to Grantchester, where they could see in the irregular surface of a field above the water meadows the supposed remains of medieval cultivation. The survival of sinuous ridge-and-furrow (as it became known), proof of its medieval origins and its role in reconstructing medieval field arrangements were to become central to Beresford's early research.

After Cambridge, and with a strong social conscience and sympathy for the underdog, Beresford did social work in London and Birmingham before being appointed to an adult education centre, the Guildhouse, in Rugby. It was here that in his spare time he developed his lifelong interests in local and Midland history. It was not long before, weekend-walking, Ordnance maps in hand, he recognised the field remains of Warwickshire villages long since deserted.

This was just at the time when W.G. Hoskins, working mainly in Leicestershire, had realised that deserted village sites were in fact more numerous than had hitherto been thought. With Hoskins's encouragement, Beresford explored his side of Watling Street; as a result both men published original and influential papers on the evidence for medieval village desertion, Hoskins for Leicestershire in 1946 ("The Deserted Villages of Leicestershire", published in Transactions of the Leicestershire Archaeological Society, revised and expanded in Essays in Leicestershire History, 1950) and Beresford for Warwickshire in 1950 ("The Deserted Villages of Warwickshire" in Transactions and Proceedings of the Birmingham Archaeological Society).

Beresford's general article of 1948 for Country Life on "Tracing Lost Villages" was picked up by J.T. Oliver at Lutterworth Press, who, in a letter of 30 June 1949, invited him to "consider doing a whole book on the subject". This resulted five years later in The Lost Villages of England (1954), Beresford's first major book and the one with which he has since been most directly identified.

To satisfy his curiosity and to prove a point, Beresford decided to verify by excavation that particular bumps on the ground surface were in fact the foundations of medieval buildings. He did this on sites at Stretton Baskerville, Warwickshire, Bittesby, Leicestershire and, soon after his appointment in 1948 to a Lectureship in Economic History at Leeds University, at the earthworks of Wharram Percy on the Yorkshire Wolds which, with two friends, he had, "discovered" on a weekend walk from the youth hostel at Malton.

Adept by then at the documentary research but conscious of his lack of proper archaeological training, Beresford admitted that he had "trespassed from history into archaeology". This was at a time when established British archaeologists were preoccupied with the prehistoric and Roman periods and had not become seriously interested in the potential of medieval sites. It was only with the arrival at Wharram in June 1952 of John Hurst, recently graduated in archaeology from Cambridge, that the research potential of deserted villages and of this site in particular was realised. The excavation of Wharram Percy (still only partial) was to occupy both men for the next 40 years.

For Beresford, it was at the centre of both his academic and social life. Not only was he the historian at Wharram but, in his own words, he was "the excavation's recruiting sergeant, its catering manager, its public relations man and its sanitary engineer". Over the years, hundreds of volunteers, young and old, gathered from universities, adult education centres, schools and, at Beresford's instigation, Borstal institutions, helped on the summer excavations. Beresford became the central figure of a "Wharram network"; many men and women who worked there became his lifelong friends.

Traces of the medieval rural landscape seen on the ground and from the air preoccupied Beresford in the 1950s. Maps and field walking resulted in many papers in journals, national and local, and in 1957 a book, History on the Ground: six studies in maps and landscapes. A year later, as a result of collaboration with Kenneth St Joseph of the Cambridge University Committee for Aerial Photography, Medieval England: an aerial survey (1958) was published. This splendidly illustrated (but far from coffee-table) book explored the surviving evidence for medieval settlements, rural and urban, which, with expert interpretation, may be used to supplement evidence from maps and documents.

Beresford, along with Hoskins, was by then being recognised as a pioneer of a new branch of history now popularly known as Landscape History. Almost 20 years of collaborative work with Hurst also led to an updated survey of the historical and archaeological work in their jointly edited Deserted Medieval Villages: studies (1971).

Beresford's interests in urban history continued to develop. Soon after his appointment at Leeds he was "kidnapped" (his word) to write Leeds Chamber of Commerce (1951), a centenary history. Thereafter and at intervals, with the help of several willing car-drivers (he never himself drove a car) he visited numerous planned medieval towns which became the corpus of his large, seminal book New Towns of the Middle Ages: town plantation in England, Wales and Gascony (1967) in which he revealed an important aspect of medieval urban history hitherto neglected. The book became the basis for all subsequent work on this topic and it continues to be much quoted by medieval urban historians.

Although medieval urbanisation continued to occupy much of his research time (another product was English Medieval Boroughs : a handlist, 1973, with H.P.R. Finberg), Leeds, which we are now apt to think of as his home town, increasingly occupied the local history niche of his enquiring mind. Increasing demolition of 18th- and 19th-century properties, not least by the university, prompted him to research in fine detail the building history of the university precinct and other parts of Leeds. Again, it was the combination of documents, early maps and direct observation which led to Walks Round Redbrick (1980) and his massive book East End, West End: the face of Leeds during urbanisation, 1684-1842 (1988).

Between times, many of his papers were published by the Hambledon Press in a collected volume with the fitting title Time and Place: collected essays (1985). In the same year he was elected a Fellow of the British Academy. He went on writing and involving himself with local societies until his health recently began to fail.

Maurice Beresford was a big man with a strong, penetrating voice. He enjoyed teaching and was a very good, witty and entertaining lecturer (almost always using slides) but, on account of many digressions, usually found it difficult to keep to time. As he reflected later, one was lucky to get away with under two hours. Aside from university offices, national committees, social-work commitments and political interests (he was essentially "old Labour"), he was a devotee of classical music, film, theatre and ballet. Research visits to London archives were almost always followed by theatre visits.

A bachelor, without any social pretensions, he owned two adjacent terraced houses in the centre of Leeds. Not for him good restaurants and fine wines; baked beans, sausages, fish and chips were his staples. He was lively company. Dog at his side, he would reminisce at length, eyes shut, fingers waving, seemingly in a world of his own until he looked to you to supply a name that he had forgotten. He could, however, be very demanding without realising it and he was not the easiest person to have as a house guest, not least because he was no respecter of furniture. Many chairs failed to survive his abrupt and weighty arrival.

Fortunately, the Chair of Economic History at Leeds which he occupied for 25 years from 1959 was not one of them and it gave him the greatest pleasure when the university recently recognised his distinguished contribution by the award of an honorary degree to add to those of Loughborough, Leicester and Hull.

-0-
 
Back
Top