- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 28,264
- Reaction score
- 7,261
- Country

He’s deliberately misinterpreted the post.Whatever, it's too much of a nice day to be playing your games. I can't be bothered with searching and double checking I have got it right

He’s deliberately misinterpreted the post.Whatever, it's too much of a nice day to be playing your games. I can't be bothered with searching and double checking I have got it right
Whatever, it's too much of a nice day to be playing your games. I can't be bothered with searching and double checking I have got it right
He’s deliberately misinterpreted the post.

Yes, bankrupt. If they "cannot pay their debts as they fall due" (or somesuch similar) they have to cease operating. Unless there's some overriding law I'm ignorant about, to keep the water flowing.?? @motorbiking?Even more difficult than the position Thames Water is in nowadays?
Stop being a PP"Crowd".
How is that misinterpreted as meaning a singular person?
LyingCalling out your lying is not pedantry![]()
Are you trying to say that there is only one labour voter on this site
the vote labour for ever crowd
Are you trying to say that there is only one labour voter on this site.

Clearly he can form an opinion based on their political views and statements. You have about mine.
Or is it just those who you feel are on the right politically who must prove their opinion?

When his sole evidence point is based on the ramblings of a confused fool who is highly motivated by politics but doesn’t vote, you can hardly expect any evidence to hold scrutiny. Anyone named will likely lie.His one example was @noseall, who has previously posted that he's voted for parties who are not Labour, as well as being not particularly interested in political parties at all.
So, when his sole evidence point is patently cobblers............
When his sole evidence point is based on the ramblings of a confused fool who is highly motivated by politics but doesn’t vote, you can hardly expect any evidence to hold scrutiny. Anyone named will likely lie.
You’re not entirely daft, surely you could figure that out?
But a little search will show you all those who share pro Labour opinions, despite their utter failure and attack those who criticise, despite the overwhelming evidence.
Is this not sufficient for a reasonable person? I think it is.
You are sounding just like billy and morq.You said
Which is not the same as someone who has voted Labour.
Ignoring for a moment your adjusting position - labour vote vs Labour forever -
YOU made the claim that there are multiple "vote Labour forever" posters on here.
It is on YOU to back that up.
Carry on squirming, or give it up.

You can’t see the damage they’ve done in just 2 short years. Vote Labour forever eh? Exhibit No 2.In your opinion.
You say "utter failure".
The basics - food, fuel, housing, to name but three - have scarcely been more expensive / unrealistic for the average Joe, yet the neoliberal model just keeps trotting out "we need to do what we're doing, but just harder!"
Austerity - the darling of the right, and posted by Ave in this thread - as a solution to our predicament, has got us where?
Infrastructure knackered, rising costs and falling outcomes, and record debt.
He's right when he says that" you'll own nothing, and you'll be happy about it ". He's only smug about this though, as he's either not realised it'll include him, or he expects to be dead before it does.