Any chance of a refund from the French?

[Notch7]

One in one out. 46 returned since the scheme started. I guess 46 have arrived during that period then?

26 I believe

but just because it is one in one out does not make it a worthless scheme, although clearly it needs to ramp up and be faster.

The ones that come here are vetted by British authorities as most suitable, I guess those that have family or other connection to UK.


Let’s not forget the Rwanda scheme had a reciprocal arrangement.

 

[Notch7]

a number of outlets jumped on the sacked quote

Thank you for agreeing with me, I’m glad we cleared that up

 

[aveatry]

Thank you for agreeing with me, I’m glad we cleared that up

No you were lying by posting an old screen shot - just before they amended it to change it to suspended.
Do you really think he said what was written.

 

[motorbiking]

calling a person gammon is not racist

but gammons are very often racist

here is an angry racist gammon

A white man.

 

[motorbiking]

26 I believe

but just because it is one in one out does not make it a worthless scheme, although clearly it needs to ramp up and be faster.

The ones that come here are vetted by British authorities as most suitable, I guess those that have family or other connection to UK.


Let’s not forget the Rwanda scheme had a reciprocal arrangement.

Rwanda was not a 1 in 1 out.

 

[Notch7]

A white man.

gammon refers to an emotion, a type of person, it is not a slur against a race

ergo it is not racist

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Rwanda was not a 1 in 1 out.

True.

How many were sent there ?

 

[Notch7]

Rwanda was not a 1 in 1 out.

was it a reciprocal arrangement, where the contract allowed for unspecified numbers to be returned

it may have ended up being 1 leaving Uk and 3 coming back

 

[motorbiking]

True.

How many were sent there ?

It’s about deterring people from coming.

Do you think a person sent to Rwanda would have simply got back on the next boat to the U.K.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It’s about deterring people from coming.

Do you think a person sent to Rwanda would have simply got back on the next boat to the U.K.

Which person?

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Rwanda was not a 1 in 1 out.

I believe it was several hundred.

 

[motorbiking]

was it a reciprocal arrangement, where the contract allowed for unspecified numbers to be returned

it may have ended up being 1 leaving Uk and 3 coming back

Not true.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

gammon refers to an emotion, a type of person, it is not a slur against a race

ergo it is not racist

It's not a protected characteristic neither.
Being a gammon is optional.

 

[Notch7]

True.

How many were sent there ?

 

[Notch7]

Not true.

please show me the Rwanda contract where it restricted numbers that could be returned



in fact let me help you, here is the text:

please note that Rwanda has 100,000 refugees

Memorandum of Understanding between the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the government of the Republic of Rwanda for the provision of an asylum partnership arrangement

www.gov.uk

summary by your favourite anti immigration website

Rwanda deal means refugees coming to Britain from Africa, government admits - Migration Watch UK

The government have said that the asylum deal with Rwanda will lead to a ‘small number of the most vulnerable refugees in Rwanda will be resettled in the UK‘ but have not yet provided any more detail about how many people this will involve. A little-noted clause in the Rwanda agreement commits...

www.migrationwatchuk.org

lets see how how the Motorbiking wriggles and squirms on this one