Arise Sir Jim Ratcliffe

Hardly comparable with a supporters club segregated by religious beliefs is it
They’re supporters who happen to be musslims, not musslims who happen to be supporters. Religious belief has nowt to do with it.
Mind u in your mind it probably is :giggle:

( no surprise :giggle:)
lol
Incidentally I used to belong to an area based motor cycle club

And I belong to two UK based car clubs
There you go
 
They’re supporters who happen to be musslims, not musslims who happen to be supporters. Religious belief has nowt to do with it.

lol

There you go

Nonsense total nonsense

They are members of the man United Muslim supporters club

MUMSC


Yes exactly

Dare say you can work out what MUMSC stands for

Than again :giggle: Probably not ???
 
Last edited:
They’re supporters who happen to be musslims, not musslims who happen to be supporters. Religious belief has nowt to do with it.

Tell that to the Maccabi Tel Aviv fans.

Religion and hatred has everything to do with it, and on that occasion the Muslims called the shots whilst the Police were too scared to take the proper action and lied to the public to conceal their fear.

It might be fair to say Birmingham has been colonised, the Muslim population certainly showed they have more power than the Police.
 
Muslims are much less likely to put their parents in nursing homes. The whole family pitches in to help the young ones by a house. They are always extremely supportive of the family in other ways.
Yes, but is all being paid for by us.

the Muslim population certainly showed they have more power than the Police.

They could easily be subdued if we had leaders with the will.
 
Well, he said that the UK population had increased by twelve million since 2020. So, yes, he was extremely wrong.
He had to justify his political opinion, and the only way he could do that is by presenting incorrect information.
And anyone of the same opinion as he, repeat the incorrect information to reinforce their beliefs.

and that is what has offended the lefties is it?
Anyone who presents incorrect information in order to influence their opinion needs to be heavily castigated.
 
...
Muslims are much less likely to put their parents in nursing homes. The whole family pitches in to help the young ones by a house. They are always extremely supportive of the family in other ways.
That isn't a monopoly by Muslims.
Many cultures behave similarly. Especially in places where Old people's Homes don't exist, or are out of the economic ability of the younger members of the family.
 
You are being argumentitive for the sake of arguing. You have failed to say what has said that has so deeply offended the lefties and why Queer Starmer has said he should apologise.
The intelligent people that can discern nonsense, supported by gibberish are offended.
The people who share his opinion, based on incorrect details, are offended because he's been shown to be talking nonsense and spouting gibberish.
 
Not objective, arguing over manufacturing data and numbers of immigrants is not what has sparked off this crazy lefty ranting and raving and stamping their silly little feet over
So anyone who prefers accuracy of data, and sensible opinions based on that accurate data, is a "crazy, leftie ranting and raving and stamping their silly little feet"?
Well I can't argue with such an objective assessment. I can laugh at it though.
 
I know.

But only 6 million economically inactive people are claiming benefits. Rather than the 9 million he claimed.
And 13 million of those are receiving State Pension.
A further 1.4 million are receiving Carer's Allowance, so hardly inactive. And if they weren't, the state would be paying even more for their care.
And what of the 3.9 million disabled people receiving PIP, and the 1.8 million receiving Attendance Allowance, do we hide them all away and pretend they don't exist in our civilised caring society.

;)
 
Back
Top