Babes in arms at the olympics

I

imamartian

did anyone see the BBC news this morning, with the report that women who've bought tickets for the Olympics and since become pregnant won't be allowed to take their babies with them to the event they've got tickets for. Even though the babies won't need a seat. One argument (from the one woman on the show) was that they'll be constantly crying.

It seems various other companies, airlines etc cater for "babes in arms"...

Are the Olympic organisers right or wrong?



(interestingly they get a woman from Mumsnet on to comment - oh i hope they don't eer have a DIY related news story !! :mrgreen: )
 
Sponsored Links
Joined
28 Oct 2005
Messages
31,283
Reaction score
1,996
Country
United Kingdom
They get on my t*ts. Stay at home and let it get on mums.
 
Sponsored Links
Joined
28 Oct 2005
Messages
31,283
Reaction score
1,996
Country
United Kingdom
The cost of the Olympics is nothing. We borrow more than that month in month out year in and year out.
 
Joined
22 Aug 2011
Messages
393
Reaction score
31
Location
Fife
Country
United Kingdom
The cost of the Olympics is nothing. We borrow more than that month in month out year in and year out.

Just been announced that it's now 5 times that nothing.
Bloody waste of time, money and effort.
 
Sponsored Links
Top