johnad - I am not a plumber so will leave the experts on here to advise you regarding the actual pipework.
However, I am aware of the combi v back boiler/cylinder arguments.
There are pros and cons for both and it all comes down to individual choice.
I have a back boiler and cylinder system. The cylinder is lagged and in good order. The back boiler is serviced annually. It is more than enough to meet my needs for hot water consumption and heating. However, the cylinder does take up space and the back boiler is less efficient than the newer combis (thus more costly to run) The main reason I have not gone the combi route is because I know I have an immersion back up in case of a failure. That was one of the main deciding factors for me.
Your situation appears to be that you have had good experiences of combis (not everyone has) and the hot water delivery rate has been fine for your needs. Your current system sounds like it may need some extra money spent on it if you keep it (possible new cylinder) and, of course, it will be generally more expensive to run [being less efficient] For you, immersion backup may not be a main factor.
On the other hand, you will need to buy the new combi and have it installed. It is correct that some rads MAY leak and need replacing but possibly they will be okay. The rest of the work you will be doing yourself so will save labour costs [but still need materials]
SO...it comes down to whether the money spent on installing a new combi system and the subsequent recoup over X years (in energy savings) would outweigh the benefits of keeping your current back boiler and cylinder.
You have to add in the unknowns such as servicing and breakdowns as well as possible inconvenience if your combi breaks down mid-winter.
All in all, it's your decision and there are good arguments for both 'sides'.
However, I am aware of the combi v back boiler/cylinder arguments.
There are pros and cons for both and it all comes down to individual choice.
I have a back boiler and cylinder system. The cylinder is lagged and in good order. The back boiler is serviced annually. It is more than enough to meet my needs for hot water consumption and heating. However, the cylinder does take up space and the back boiler is less efficient than the newer combis (thus more costly to run) The main reason I have not gone the combi route is because I know I have an immersion back up in case of a failure. That was one of the main deciding factors for me.
Your situation appears to be that you have had good experiences of combis (not everyone has) and the hot water delivery rate has been fine for your needs. Your current system sounds like it may need some extra money spent on it if you keep it (possible new cylinder) and, of course, it will be generally more expensive to run [being less efficient] For you, immersion backup may not be a main factor.
On the other hand, you will need to buy the new combi and have it installed. It is correct that some rads MAY leak and need replacing but possibly they will be okay. The rest of the work you will be doing yourself so will save labour costs [but still need materials]
SO...it comes down to whether the money spent on installing a new combi system and the subsequent recoup over X years (in energy savings) would outweigh the benefits of keeping your current back boiler and cylinder.
You have to add in the unknowns such as servicing and breakdowns as well as possible inconvenience if your combi breaks down mid-winter.
All in all, it's your decision and there are good arguments for both 'sides'.