Ahhh so I don't have to update to RCBO's in order to get LABC approval.As has been explaind, having all circuits protected by a single RCD would not be a very good idea (and most would say is non-compliant with current regs.).
However, I'm getting a little confused by the discussion here, and wonder whether it is not perhaps ranging a little more widely than may be strictly necessary for you.
Although it is obviously desirable that your (or anyone's) entire electrical installation should be brought into compliance with current regulations, there is no requirement for that, and BC's only interest in the electrics should relate to the electrics in, and/or associated with, your new extension. From what you say, that probably amounts to just the new sockets ring circuit and an extension to an existing lighting circuit.
Your CU appears to have two unlabelled RCD-protected ways - are they 'spare'? If so, one of those could be used to provide an RCD-protected supply for the new ring (which, being a sockets circuit, now must have RCD protection, regardless of how the cable is routed and protected). As for the extension's lighting, any requirements for RCD protection (which would depend upon cable routing etc.) could, as has been said, be satisfied by changing the MCB protecting that (currently not RCD-protected) circuit to an RCBO.
Am I missing something?
Kind Regards, John
Yes John there are 3 spare MCB's, 2 RCD protected & 1 not, although I hope to keep 1 for Aico smoke alarms, & if I follow Owains advice one for an electric cooker, although I will be installing a gas cooker, it will future proof me. I already have a down and upstairs lighting circuit, and a front and rear ring main for sockets, and would have thought I can simply add the new kitchen to the rear sockets ring, and downstairs lighting circuits.