BALENCING QUESTION

Joined
21 Jul 2007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Powys
Country
United Kingdom
hi guys just a quicky ,i have a valliant system boiler and a y plan system and was just wondering do i balence the rads with the 3 port valve on the heating side or in the midle position ,at the mo the rads heat fine on the heating only but if i ask for water as well 2 of the downstairs rads lose heat and both trv and other valve is open
 
Sponsored Links
You need a balancing valve in the cylinder return as well. A gate valve is fine for this and is easier to set than otherwise far superior lever valves.
 
so a gate valve on the return pipe from the cylinder to the main circuit is that right ,and roughtly what half closed
 
A few quid for the valve then however long it takes. Probably under an hour if access is good and there are no other problems/air locks.

Labour rates vary greatly, but between £50 and £90 an hour in London.
 
Sponsored Links
What sort of hw cylinder is it? If it is a modern fast recovery then I wouldn't put a balancing gate valve in the return as these need full flow to acheive their fast re-heat times.

In this case just re-balance your rads just on heating only.

If it is a standard cylinder then do as Dan says.
 
I would suggest that you first try balancing your rads.

A simple start is to close all lockshields and then open each one one turn and the two problem rads two turns.

Finer adjustment if required see the FAQ on this site.

Tony
 
hi wow lots of replys the cylinder is a standard indirect as for the gate valve no probs ill fit one tomorrow
 
LONDON said:
as for the gate valve no probs ill fit one tomorrow

Gate valves aren't much good for balancing, the resistance imposed isn't proportional to the opening; so almost all the flow regulation happens in the first turn from closed.

A needle valve is better.
http://www.hattersley.com/productView.asp?prodID=19&catID=3

A double-regulating valve is best of all, the advantage being that you can lock the setting so it can be isolated and re-opened without losing the balanced setting.

http://www.hattersley.com/productView.asp?prodID=55&catID=8

They cost more and I've never seen one on a domestic cylinder.
Other than mine. :LOL:
 
For all he knows the problem might just be balancing of the existing rads!

Better to do that first and then fit the gate valve afterwards IF necessary.

Any reduction if flow to the HW will lengthen recovery of the cylinder!

Tony
 
I would never fit a balancing valve to a cylinder on a Y plan unless to acheive an optimum flowrate through the heat exchanger specified by the manufacturer.
If the two systems operate together whether they are S plan or Y plan then hot water should have priority IMO.
 
Agile said:
For all he knows the problem might just be balancing of the existing rads!
Better to do that first and then fit the gate valve afterwards IF necessary.
Any reduction if flow to the HW will lengthen recovery of the cylinder!
Tony
It could be, but then he says it's fine on heating only, but that there's a loss of flow to 2 rads when on heating AND hot water.

The cylinder is often near the boiler, it's piped in 22mm tube, and the cylinder coil is usually 22mm and has little hydraulic resistance. The result is a roaring short-circuit; most of the water goes through the cylinder coil and starves the heating circuit, which has a high hydraulioc resistance. In addition, the flow rate through the cylinder is excessive and the water returns to the boiler with a very low temperature loss, which reduces the boiler efficiency.

There's usually about 3kW or 5 kW allocated for the DHWS load. If he's losing heating whilst there's DHWS demand, it suggests the DHWS is getting 50% or more of the flow, which might be 8 or 10 kW.


Balenza said:
I would never fit a balancing valve to a cylinder on a Y plan unless to acheive an optimum flowrate through the heat exchanger specified by the manufacturer.
If the two systems operate together whether they are S plan or Y plan then hot water should have priority IMO.

If you want hot water to have priority, then you'd go W-plan.
If you want to regulate the flow rate and have heating whilst there's a DHWS demand, you usually need a regulating valve.

http://content.honeywell.com/UK/homes/Catalogue/Sundial Plans/3.3 W Plan.pdf
 
Onetap wrote

If you want hot water to have priority, then you'd go W-plan

I have an S plan and when HW and CH are on simontaneously HW has priorty because the HW circuit has least resistance to flow.
Why throttle it back and restrict flow when HW only called for ?
 
Thats fine but balancing the HW circuit in conjuction with the CH system is another matter.
 
Clearly the problem only arises when the midposition valve is supplying water to cylinder as well as radiators.

If the radiators are heating evenly, each one has the correct temperature difference between flow and return pipes, I would suggest installing a valve on the cylinder return pipe as it is causing the imbalance.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top