Bradford city of culture 2025

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 317777
  • Start date Start date
ReganAndCarter said:
The Spanish only have themselves to blame. They welcomed us in with open arms when they were being carried around on donkeys because they had nothing except tomatoes and wanted to grow their economy. We brought money, jobs, prosperity and lager louts. Now they're moaning because their own immigration policies became too successful and numbers in some parts too big. They were so desperate for our Eeengleesh Pounds they even let our crims live their lives on The Costas - no questions.
Click to expand...
:LOL: That made me lol. I think they also did a good trade in oranges too to be fair. Well they are priced out of areas of their own country now and that is not OK. In the same way, it is not OK for our English towns and cities to be colonised by non Brits who do not share our values. Two wrongs don't make a right.
 
ReganAndCarter said:
Yes, the gangs especially in London. Black and carrying knives - or do you deny reality?
Click to expand...

Thing is, I think violence and criminality, as is also the case with lying, and sexual assault, are choices.

You've - previously, and again here - said it is innate.
 
Regardless of whether or not it is his actual skin colour or not it is derogatory. I have seen plenty of other unpleasant references to white skinned people on this forum being branded as 'gammon'. Which plenty of you think is fine but heaven forbid if someone were to start brandishing brown skinned people as 'p*ki' or black skinned people as 'n*gger'.
 
. said:
Regardless of whether or not it is his actual skin colour or not it is derogatory. I have seen plenty of other unpleasant references to white skinned people on this forum being branded as 'gammon'. Which plenty of you think is fine but heaven forbid if someone were to start brandishing brown skinned people as 'p*ki' or black skinned people as 'n*gger'.
Click to expand...

I have to disagree. I believe it is very important whether somebody has done it by choice. Lots of people with bad spray tans get mocked with phrases such as oompa loompa. I have never thought that was racist. However, I would never call a red faced white man a "gammon", because that is something they have no control over.
 
MNW67 said:
I have to disagree. I believe it is very important whether somebody has done it by choice. Lots of people with bad spray tans get mocked with phrases such as oompa loompa. I have never thought that was racist. However, I would never call a red faced white man a "gammon", because that is something they have no control over.
Click to expand...
Then I think you are what you hate in others.
 
. said:
Then I think you are what you hate in others.
Click to expand...

Can you explain that a bit more? I would never personally call anyone an oompa loompa. And I have never made reference to Trump's orangeness. I find it childish. But that's not the same as it being racist. I am always happy to be persuaded, though.
 
. said:
Regardless of whether or not it is his actual skin colour or not it is derogatory. I have seen plenty of other unpleasant references to white skinned people on this forum being branded as 'gammon'. Which plenty of you think is fine but heaven forbid if someone were to start brandishing brown skinned people as 'p*ki' or black skinned people as 'n*gger'.
Click to expand...
Gammon was thrown around the GD for a long time, mainly by noseal

It’s like people are ashamed to be white “apologists”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
6 dead politicians
Replies
1
Views
142
Notch7
N
motorbiking
Civil war in the Labour Party.
2
Replies
20
Views
575
blup
B
Ihavenojob
Happy birthday Mr Carter
Replies
0
Views
297
Ihavenojob
Ihavenojob
D
Biden has stepped down
2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
Brigadier
B
K
Should we Revoke Trump's Visa to UK?
Replies
9
Views
528
Deleted member 317777
D
Back
Top