- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 26,609
- Reaction score
- 6,162
- Country

so why did the employer "let him go"?It was the Trump government which complained, not the organisation.
You seem to have missed that.

so why did the employer "let him go"?It was the Trump government which complained, not the organisation.
You seem to have missed that.
I don't worship trump. I think he's mostly a tw@t, but do recognise his skills and ability.
so why did the employer "let him go"?

Bit the hand that fed him..Trump government told APG to fire Hanover or they would lose government support.
Hanover hoped sacking this guy would alter their mind.
It didn't.
Bit the hand that fed him..
We got there.
I think you want people to listen to you. Otherwise, what is the point, you may as well keep a diary.
Its not a criticism btw,

Have you ever been DISC profiled? High I and C perhaps?Strangest post of the day.
And utterly unrelated to what I wrote.

He was a very senior member of staff, his posts reflected on his "employer"It's still a (freedom of expression) opinion. Ridiculous that he was hunted down by the Trump fascists.
How could anyone critcise Trump
Have you ever been DISC profiled? High I and C perhaps?

Starmer would only change his mind anyway….Unless he made the comments before the Trump administration decided to implement the 'no freedom of speech' clause for visa applications. And he deleted his comments after the condition was placed.
Can you imagine Starmer passing down a stipulation that anyone applying for a UK visa would be denied if they made any comments about Starmer?
How? Were his opinions truthful and honest?his posts reflected on his "employer"
So probably a high C, then I.