Certain members on here who are banging on about what Farage is supposed to have said 50 years ago

[ellal]

Yes, as I said when you first questioned me on this a while back, I said they were appalling things to say and that if true, he should apologise. I did also mitigate that they were comments made by a schoolboy.

So you regard a sixth former as a 'schoolboy'?

I still think the smartest move on his part would be a clarification on his current beliefs together with a very well crafted apology.

In other words, you think he should lie yet again

 

[fillyboy]

So you regard a sixth former as a 'schoolboy'?


In other words, you think he should lie yet again

Perhaps you're right. he should be put up against a wall and shot, or perhaps you have a harsher punishment in mind. What do you think should be done..

 

[Mottie]

So you regard a sixth former as a 'schoolboy'?

Judging by the number of 25-30 year olds I used to see playing games on their phones on their way to work on the train, I’d say a sixth former would be considered positively juvenile.

 

[noseall]

People have changed so why not Nigel Farage.

Good question.

Anyone that had doubts with respect to the fact he was an out and out racist Jew hating fascist, in charge of the foreigner hating party and dedicating a large part of his life in support of the far right, both here and abroad - they certainly have no doubts now.

Changed, my arse.

 

[ellal]

"Why would I? I don't consider it genocide. I do condemn the October 7 attack that started this all off. Do you?"

Well here's your problem...

I have condemned the violence from all sides time and time again, including the October attack...

You are a genocide denier and believe that the conflict only started in 2023...

You therefore simply show your prejudices against the Palestinians and you have no interest in a just and peaceful solution!

 

[carmanmemoranda]

No defence then, just flapping your gums. Good job.

Just pointing out your bias by not reading the details.

It's as much a Tory issue as it is a labour 1.

But your prejudice won't let you see that

Let's see the swerve, now

 

[ellal]

Judging by the number of 25-30 year olds I used to see playing games on their phones on their way to work on the train, I’d say a sixth former would be considered positively juvenile.

Funnily enough there were no phones back when 'gas 'em all' garbage was spouting off...

But just out of interest, at what age do you believe a person should be considered responsible for their own actions/utterances?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Do you even realise that the alleged comments predate all hate speech legislation?

Do you mean of this guy ?

But it's important to you, but farage comments aren't.

Hmmm. No bias then

Swerve away

 

[Mottie]

I have condemned the violence from all sides time and time again, including the October attack...

Can you show us when and where you specifically condemned the October 7 attack? Was it any time in October?

 

[noseall]

Good ol Nige.

Good? I thought you despised Jew haters?

 

[Mottie]

But just out of interest, at what age do you believe a person should be considered responsible for their own actions/utterances?

18. When they can vote. Drink in pubs. Join the army. Get married without their parents permission. Be named publicly in criminal cases. Open a bank account. Take out a loan. Buy fireworks. Make a bet. Buy a lottery ticket. Serve on a jury. Buy tobacco…..

What about you, what age do you think a person should be considered responsible for their own actions/utterances and why?

 

[motorbiking]

Just pointing out your bias by not reading the details.

It's as much a Tory issue as it is a labour 1.

But your prejudice won't let you see that

Let's see the swerve, now

Still flapping.

You were invited to make a case defending him. You didn’t want to. No need to keep crying about it.

Its acutely an ECHR issue.

 

[MNW67]

Its acutely an ECHR issue.

Oh no! In what way?

 

[motorbiking]

Do you mean of this guy ?

But it's important to you, but farage comments aren't.

Hmmm. No bias then

Swerve away

You want someone to be referred for prosecution for crimes that didn’t exist?

Dafter than your daft mate.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Still flapping.

You were invited to make a case defending him. You didn’t want to. No need to keep crying about it.

Its acutely an ECHR issue.

I clearly said I'm not defending him

I was just pointing out your I ability to understand all the details.

Keep swerving