Daily Dose of Uk Banana Republic Contracts

WRONG

they are cases they won

Fillyboy is trying to argue against facts again, its what brexers do :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

It's not wrong, it was overturned in the high court last week.
The Govt won, the bloke who dresses up as a woman to kill foxes lost, get over it.

Court rules Government didn't break law over Covid contract for Cummings' friends - Mirror Online

The Government has won its Court of Appeal bid to overturn an earlier High Court ruling that the decision to award a contract to market research firm Public First was unlawful
The Government did not break the law over contracts handed to friends of Dominic Cummings, a court has ruled.

Campaign group the Good Law Project is now seeking to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Last year, the High Court ruled that the Cabinet Office's decision to award a contract to market research firm Public First was unlawful as it gave rise to "apparent bias".

The organisation was given a contract for over £550,000 in June 2020 for focus groups and other research - including testing public health slogans such as "Stay at home, protect the NHS, save lives".

The Good Law Project brought a case over the links between the firm's founders and the Prime Minister's former adviser as well as then-Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove.

In the original ruling, Mrs Justice O'Farrell found that the "apparent bias" was not due to the existing relationships between Mr Cummings and Public First but because of a failure to consider any other research agency and record the objective criteria used in the selection.

However, in a judgment on Tuesday, the Court of Appeal overturned the previous ruling.

The Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, sitting with Lord Justice Coulson and Lady Justice Carr, found that the original judgment was an "unprecedented outcome".

Lord Burnett concluded: "The fair-minded and reasonably informed observer would not have concluded that a failure to carry out a comparative exercise of the type identified by the judge created a real possibility that the decision-maker was biased."

Dominic Cummings said the Court of Appeal ruling was "total vindication for my decisions on moving super speedy on procurement to save lives".

The Good Law Project said it was now seeking permission to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Jo Maugham, Director of Good Law Project, said: "We haven’t lost a case in court since 2019. But you don’t win everything forever - especially when you are fighting the most difficult cases in the most difficult terrain.
 
Sponsored Links
Inward tech investment into the UK currently stands at 20% higher than France and Germany combined.
Germany has a full order book. The UK needs all the help it can get especially from decent contacts and not jokey stuff to fluff up the numbers.

Germany is an economic powerhouse.
 
Inward tech investment into the UK currently stands at 20% higher than France and Germany combined. Some pf those charts will need updating in a few years time.

Money into green field areas many of which go nowhere. For instance think about Az. Has interest faded as some one else has come up with something better?

It's also worth remembering bubbles such as the dot com one. New tech can make colossal amounts of money so money is looking for them. A recent one on the medical side of things has turned out to be a farce. Falsifying progress too.

Seems we are going to get giga factories. Batteries so far one reason being selling into the EU. They need to be made here to avoid tariffs. There are suggestions that I haven't tried to look into that Germany will out giga us easily.
 
It's not wrong, it was overturned in the high court last week.
The Govt won, the bloke who dresses up as a woman to kill foxes lost, get over it.

Court rules Government didn't break law over Covid contract for Cummings' friends - Mirror Online

The Government has won its Court of Appeal bid to overturn an earlier High Court ruling that the decision to award a contract to market research firm Public First was unlawful
The Government did not break the law over contracts handed to friends of Dominic Cummings, a court has ruled.

Campaign group the Good Law Project is now seeking to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Last year, the High Court ruled that the Cabinet Office's decision to award a contract to market research firm Public First was unlawful as it gave rise to "apparent bias".

The organisation was given a contract for over £550,000 in June 2020 for focus groups and other research - including testing public health slogans such as "Stay at home, protect the NHS, save lives".

The Good Law Project brought a case over the links between the firm's founders and the Prime Minister's former adviser as well as then-Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove.

In the original ruling, Mrs Justice O'Farrell found that the "apparent bias" was not due to the existing relationships between Mr Cummings and Public First but because of a failure to consider any other research agency and record the objective criteria used in the selection.

However, in a judgment on Tuesday, the Court of Appeal overturned the previous ruling.

The Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett, sitting with Lord Justice Coulson and Lady Justice Carr, found that the original judgment was an "unprecedented outcome".

Lord Burnett concluded: "The fair-minded and reasonably informed observer would not have concluded that a failure to carry out a comparative exercise of the type identified by the judge created a real possibility that the decision-maker was biased."

Dominic Cummings said the Court of Appeal ruling was "total vindication for my decisions on moving super speedy on procurement to save lives".

The Good Law Project said it was now seeking permission to take the case to the Supreme Court.

Jo Maugham, Director of Good Law Project, said: "We haven’t lost a case in court since 2019. But you don’t win everything forever - especially when you are fighting the most difficult cases in the most difficult terrain.
That’s a minor case

this is far more important:

“LONDON — A fast-track lane that let ministers, MPs and officials refer their contacts for lucrative government PPE deals was unlawful, the High Court of England and Wales ruled”

https://www.politico.eu/article/high-court-uk-vip-lane-ppe-contract-unlawful/

come on Filly, when are you going to admit you voted for and support a cabal of crooks
 
Sponsored Links
The Govt won, the bloke who dresses up as a woman to kill foxes lost, get over it.

Terminology aimed at a left wing person and nothing else. One thing that did become clear early on is that England's judges do not want to get involved in politics. ;)Looks like the police may want to - why?

More of similar today. Need something in the news, Bright idea by the foreign office - Russia has picked a politician and intend to invade and put him in power. It revives stale news aided by newscasters needing to find things to report. Cummings seems to be doing the same re Boris etc.

Boris is getting a bit stale so it seems parties in his own flat at No10 now figure. I wonder where that came from.
 
...so money is looking for them. ......

smiling-businessman-looking-dollar-banknotes-600w-264809651.jpg

:whistle:

There are suggestions that I haven't tried to look into ...
Who suggested that?
:whistle:
 
Germany has a full order book. The UK needs all the help it can get especially from decent contacts and not jokey stuff to fluff up the numbers.

Germany is an economic powerhouse.

well yes they were to busy flogging arms to the Greeks who were at one time the 6th biggest arms importers in the world with a population of what 8 million

the Germans are to busy flogging white goods and have contributed not a lot to defence and nato

free loaders ;) who took part in a nato excercise with broom handles on there tanks to simulate gun barrels :ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top