Don't get me wrong, I do believe that Iran shouldn’t have nuclear weapons..

many would say it shortened the war and saved many lives by doing so. The Japanese weren't going to surrender.
You can go round and round with that argument...

Fact is that the only country at the time with nuclear weapons decided to deploy them against two civilian targets...

Hence the race by other nations to acquire them...

And as for the non proliferation treaty, North Korea, India, Pakistan, israel, and for a short time South Africa managed to get around it.

In part aided by those who drafted the treaty!
 
Try the search function, my position on both of the above is there for all to see.

And no, I'm not wasting my time reiterating what I've said before because, as you clearly didn't take it in before, there's next to no chance that you'll do so this time.
I wouldn't ask you too. I just wonder why you object so much to people's dislike for foreign criminals.

Like No e nosall do you put good and bad immigration in the same box?
 
I wouldn't ask you too. I just wonder why you object so much to people's dislike for foreign criminals.

Like No e nosall do you put good and bad immigration in the same box?

When you start on the wrong track and blindly continue, it's no wonder you end up so wide of the mark.

Do you do it out of ignorance, trollery, or to fit in with a group?
 
Back
Top