But that's a lie, isn't it?
In that case you won't enjoy my mundane answer to Bahco's other question -
the one that you and everyone else ignored.
Email retrieval
- Thread starter Bahco
- Start date
the one that you and everyone else ignored.
Sponsored Links
In that case you won't enjoy my mundane answer to Bahco's other question -
the one that you and everyone else ignored.
It's a shame you don't posts more like that, a lot of your post are good and constructive no doubt. The point yet again is your put down of other posters.
This isn't the GD forum. If you don't know the answer, or can't put it into words, then don't post. It's simple.
In the absence of that principle, this forum would just increment the count of festering piles of yakkity b*llocks, where contributors, instead of analysing problems, just post a near-random 'fix' that they applied to their own computer in circumstances that they're incapable of noticing are different to that of he OP.
The man who doesn't run away cannot be chased.
By the same token, those who are secure in their grasp of the facts cannot feel put down.
In the absence of that principle, this forum would just increment the count of festering piles of yakkity b*llocks, where contributors, instead of analysing problems, just post a near-random 'fix' that they applied to their own computer in circumstances that they're incapable of noticing are different to that of he OP.
The man who doesn't run away cannot be chased.
By the same token, those who are secure in their grasp of the facts cannot feel put down.
The OP's original question was answered way back on page one. The reason it is now in danger of hitting the four page mark is because of your irrelevant posts, or to quote you 'yakkity b*llocks'.
You clearly have some knowledge, it's just a shame you don't put it to better use.
Sponsored Links
I disagree.
Between TonyW, Dobbo and yourself, you've written (and rolled about on the floor) far more times about my posts than I've posted on this topic, and I've posted nothing that isn't factually correct, and all of you utterly ignored Bahco's secondary question, seemingly because you were absorbed by your obsessive quest for political correctness.
Sponsored Links
