Falklands

Yes, because

And apparently we forced China to ceed it to us in perpetuity in 1840 something. We then realised keeping it wasn't going to work and arranged a phased handover with the 99 year lease.

Who cares about what was done in 1840 over some Hong Kong caper / stitch up

It has nowt to do or relevant to the Falklands
 
Who cares about what was done in 1840 over some Hong Kong caper / stitch up

It has nowt to do or relevant to the Falklands
You don't see any similarities? An island far away from the UK filled with people who think they are British Citizens that we decided to hand over to the neighbouring power?
 
There are so few of them and it's so expensive defending and subsidising them we could give every one of them a million pounds, resettle them in Hull and break even in less than 30 years.
Hull is an excellent idea. HM will be trembling with anticipation. They can even bring their sheep. Ewe've been warned
 
Hull is an excellent idea. HM will be trembling with anticipation. They can even bring their sheep. Ewe've been warned
I feel certain they would soon realise that they would prefer to be under the Argentine flag rather than to be subjected to the humiliation of living in Hull.
 
Back
Top