Yup.its like banning kids from playing Conkers.
Totallly bonkers as the HSE have confirmed.
Totallly bonkers as the HSE have confirmed.
Last edited:

Indeed. A friend of mine has a fairly senior position in HSE and he is very annoyed, and quite 'upset', by the way that so many things get greatly over-interpreted (and 'blamed on HSE'), resulting in all these stories about seemingly crazy rules/practices ("this coffee may be hot", "this peanut butter may contain peanuts" etc.) which get (he obviously thinks unfairly) such a bad name/'press' for HSE.Yup.its like banning kids from playing Conner’s. Totallly bonkers as the HSE have confirmed.
I think in all honesty the HSE themselves don't issue too much crepe, what gets the bad press is (particularly 'big') companies solutions to risk assessments going way over the top and set in stone to the point it actually prevents an employee/contractor etc doing a job - such as no live electrical working and then expecting a circuit being faulted!...I don't know (somewhat doubt!) that it is totally true, but he insists that all the edicts of HSE are 'sensible', and that they are 'never' as OTT as we are sometimes led to believe!
Kind Regards, John
Yes, that's obviously what my HSE friend believes, and what I've always assumed is largely true.I think in all honesty the HSE themselves don't issue too much crepe, what gets the bad press is (particularly 'big') companies solutions to risk assessments going way over the top and set in stone to the point it actually prevents an employee/contractor etc doing a job - such as no live electrical working and then expecting a circuit being faulted!
I have contacted HSE on 3 occasions regarding site rules/rulings which to my mind are hazardous, all 3 of those resulted in HSE site visits (they used to love inviting themselves into sites when complaints surface), HSE upheld all 3 of my question/complaint and worked through the problem. 2 were closed pending other safety issues being resolved.Yes, that's obviously what my HSE friend believes, and what I've always assumed is largely true.
I suspect that it could well be the lawyers of the big companies who are the most to blame - inventing way-OTT rules that they believe will "protect the company's backsides" and using HSE as the scapegoat they can 'blame'!
That doesn't surprise me.I have contacted HSE on 3 occasions regarding site rules/rulings which to my mind are hazardous, all 3 of those resulted in HSE site visits (they used to love inviting themselves into sites when complaints surface), HSE upheld all 3 of my question/complaint and worked through the problem. 2 were closed pending other safety issues being resolved.
Exactly!How often do we hear “it’s health and safety” when we are faced with absurd rules someone has drawn up? Total nonsense sometimes. Sometimes it’s just a seemingly sensible rule blown out of all proportion or applied incorrectly to extremes as if something being done is better than nothing at all and we all suffer because of these lunatic misconceptions.
Indeed - and, as I said, another problem with 'obviously absurd' rules is that they will make people complacent about rules that really matter (similar to "crying wolf").Sometimes the same person (s) misses out things that really should be addressed too.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local