Gravity feed shower - tank volume sufficient?

Joined
17 Oct 2019
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
We want to install a gravity fed shower on the ground floor to replace an old electric shower that was fed off the mains. In the attic, there is a 25 gall/114 litre plastic tank, that must have been installed when the house was rebuilt in 1985, and which was put in place before the loft hatchway was fitted. The hatch is a tight squeeze (12 inches wide; 27inches long) so adding a larger tank would be difficult/impossible. The hatch can't be increased in size due to the roof trusses which support a heavy stone slab traditional roof.

The tank also supplies the hot water tank (vented). Water pressure is not a problem. There are two of us and we shower daily, so it's not a high family demand.

Will 25 galls capacity be sufficient?

Are there any alternatives we might consider, but haven't thought of, to supply the gravity shower?

Thank you in advance for any advice/suggestions.
 
It all comes down to supply pressure and flow to the cistern and the type of shower being used. if it's a free flowing shower type then it can flow as much as it's supplied with so will use up the stored supply faster, if it's say a bar shower then it tends to be more restrictive.

The key with it all is, can the CWSC have the water replaced faster then the shower can use it. The cistern should really supply both hot and cold.

There is also the option of tandem'ing it up with another coffin type cistern for extra capacity. Some coffin tanks are around 300mm wide, so should fit if you take the facing off around the hatch
 
Thanks for that - really helpful.

The shower has an Ultra Valquest DC70 Dual Valve Thermostatic Cartridge fitted and is thermostatically regulated by a cartridge so I don't think it's the free flowing type (although I could be wrong!). Water pressure is usually great, in fact we have to ensure we don't open the main stopcock too wide!

Aside from the small loft hatch dimensions, there's not a lot of space to fit another tank up there and the current tank sits very close to the loft opening, with trusses everywhere. The stone slabs have a low, traditional pitch too so headroom is greatly restricted. When I've had to work up there such as to install extra loft insulation; a few lights; and to chase out the local stoats (we live in a very rural place) who occasionally like to take up residence, it often demands a full pilates session or two afterwards! :)
 
Yes, that's basically what I was thinking.

But the plumber I'd consulted about doing the job was a bit uncertain - neither for or against. I'd thought that we could take a feed off the gravity cold feed to the hot water cylinder to supply the shower, which he thought might be okay, but he then suggested drilling another hole/outlet in the tank specifically for the shower feed. To my 'none plumber mind', I wondered if having one mains feed in to the tank, but now two (instead of one) gravity feeds out, might mean the 25 gall tank might empty quicker than the feed in and cause problems both filling the hot water cylinder sufficiently and/or the shower, leading to problems such as water temperature regulation- although the thermostatic shower valve should sort that.

Maybe I'm just over thinking this and it'll all be fine!
 
Unfortunately you cant just say - water pressure's great so it's all fine - pressure and flow are linked but they are 2 different things. No- you wouldn't normally use the same supply pipe that feeds the HW cylinder to cold feed a shower - they should have their own supplies.
If the shower can flow (hot and cold) more than the inlet to the cistern can flow, then the cistern will empty faster than the supply can make it up, it really is as simple as that. Ideally you want to know, in L/min, what the feed into the cistern delivers and that's then compared to the shower flow on full.
I can't find a manual for that shower so can't tell what it will flow @ max. The delivery to the cistern is easy, shut the supply to the cistern, run a cold tap to empty it say half way then turn the water back on and fill a container at the cistern feed fully open, timed over 30 secs, measure what you have then x2.
At the end of the day it is relatively easy process to find out if it will be ok or not and your plumber should be able to work through (edit) that process pretty easily for you.
Maybe I'm just over thinking this and it'll all be fine!
People that don't consider these types of thing properly are the ones that invariably run into issues, always best to get it checked out.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately you cant just say - water pressure's great so it's all fine - pressure and flow are linked but they are 2 different things. No- you wouldn't normally use the same supply pipe that feeds the HW cylinder to cold feed a shower - they should have their own supplies.
If the shower can flow (hot and cold) more than the inlet to the cistern can flow, then the cistern will empty faster than the supply can make it up, it really is as simple as that. Ideally you want to know, in L/min, what the feed into the cistern delivers and that's then compared to the shower flow on full.
I can't find a manual for that shower so can't tell what it will flow @ max. The delivery to the cistern is easy, shut the supply to the cistern, run a cold tap to empty it say half way then turn the water back on and fill a container at the cistern feed fully open, timed over 30 secs, measure what you have then x2.
At the end of the day it is relatively easy process to find out if it will be ok or not and your plumber should be able to work through (edit) that process pretty easily for you.

People that don't consider these types of thing properly are the ones that invariably run into issues, always best to get it checked out.
Thanks for that advice - I'm trying to get my unpractical brain around it!

Just an update and a request for confirmation/explanation.

The plumber has put in a temporary solution so we can see if this works- i.e there's sufficient water capacity in the current tank to answer the question as to whether we need an additional tank up there for the shower's own cold supply. He took a cold supply to the shower, off the current cold supply to the HW cylinder, just above the HW cylinder's supply.

So far, that seems fine. Just the two off us (2 bed cottage), and we usually only shower once a day, one after each other most mornings. No lack of water so far, and shower's water flow rate is fine. I sometimes run my shower cold, and while the rate is slower, it's still adequate. Also, when listening to the cold water tank fill up after the showers, the sound of the inlet valve filling stops after a min, or so. It seems the tank is not emptying a great deal, (inlet and outlet flow rates reasonably matched) and not needing to fill for a long period to replace the water that has flown out.

To try and ascertain the tank inlet and outlet flow rates, I ran the shower on max (after checking the handbook/manual and finding no info on this). Anyway, the shower filled a measuring bucket to 6.5 litres in 1 min. Now trying to discover the cold water tank fill rate is/was extremely difficult. While the tank is a 29 gall/114 litre capacity, the inlet is obviously set below the top of the tank rim (so the tanks hold less than 114 L) and in the awkward, limited space of the loft, with a black tank i na dark space - even with a head torch - I couldn't get an accurate estimate of the change in that capacity/level, when running the shower and trying to measure the flow rate into the tank.

What I tried, if this helps, was to measure, indirectly, the water flow rate of the cold mains supply into the tank by checking the L/min of an outside cold tap, on full flow, just down line of the tank's inlet. That was about 45 L/min. I do realise that the rate through the tank's ballcock valve will be less than this.

The plumber said that if the tank's capacity seems fine for us, he'll have to return and put in a separate cold feed out of the tank to supply the shower, requiring drilling the cold tank for this. Advice above also told me that the shower needed to have this separate cold supply, rather than our temporary fix with a shared single outlet from the tank for the HW cylinder and the shower.

Please can someone explain to me (a plumbing dunce!) why this is necessary (you'd need to explain slowly and in simple, idiot-proof language!). I'm worried that if an extra outlet (22mm?) is drilled in the tanks, this will mean 2x the flow and speed of the tank emptying (?). Also, I've read that the cold supply from the tank to the shower has to be 50/60mm below the cold supply to the HW cylinder, so that if the tank runs dry/or very low, the supply to the hot will cease first and the shower will run cold rather than scalding. From what I can see in the loft space, there's no ability to do this as the outlet is already low in the tank.

With the current, temporary fix, with one shared supply to HW and cold shower feed, if the tank runs dry/near empty, then both the HW and cold will stop simultaneously, or slow at the same rates (?).

Can the HW still run out the top of the HW cylinder if there's no, or very little, cold supply pushing in from the bottom? Or, is there a syphon effect from the top of the HW tank so it'll keep flowing, hot, when there's no cold coming in at the bottom?Again, sorry for the numpty questions. Every day's a school day as they say!

Thanks for your patience.
 
Last edited:
A bit confused re tests.
If your existing shower is gravity fed?? which I presume it is with a vented HW cylinder then why not run that at its normal showering flowrate. 6.5LPM??, then open another gravity fed tap, hot or cold, to give the same flowrate of ~ 6.5LPM, ensure no others using water, then, say 15 minutes later, check level in the CWSC.
 
Please can someone explain to me (a plumbing dunce!) why this is necessary (you'd need to explain slowly and in simple, idiot-proof language!). I'm worried that if an extra outlet (22mm?) is drilled in the tanks, this will mean 2x the flow and speed of the tank emptying (?).

The hot and cold, are both being sourced from the loft tank, so that the pressure, at the mixer is the same/equal.
 
The hot and cold, are both being sourced from the loft tank, so that the pressure, at the mixer is the same/equal.
Yes, the pressure will be the same, but will the flow rate be doubled with x2 22mm outlets as opposed to x1 22 mm outlet? So the CW tank will empty quicker?
 
if an extra outlet (22mm?) is drilled in the tanks, this will mean 2x the flow and speed of the tank emptying (?).
Yes, the pressure will be the same, but will the flow rate be doubled with x2 22mm outlets as opposed to x1 22 mm outlet? So the CW tank will empty quicker?

Nope - your shower output has a nominal output of 6.5L/min, regardless of whether it has 1 or 2 (edit) supplies from the Cold Water Cistern (CWSC), it shouldn't flow double that just because it has 2 separate supplies. It's all from the same source and therefore it's all at the same pressure/flow regardless. There are other factors that will dictate the output of the shower like head of pressure and the max that the shower itself can flow with that head of pressure but pressure in that scenario would be constant so the shower wouldn't normally flow any more.

6.5L/min is quite low as far as a shower output is concerned and if you are happy with your shower delivering @ that I don't think you'll have any concerns with emptying a 125L CWSC.

Once the CWSC stops supplying the HW cylinder, no more water will flow from the cylinder. That's why the feed from the cistern to the HW cylinder should always be higher than the cold feed to the shower, that way the HW will stop first and there's no risk of scalding, which there would be if the cold was above the hot feed (unless the shower was TMV2/3 enabled)
 
Last edited:
Nope - your shower output has a nominal output of 6.5L/min, regardless of whether it has 1 or 2 supplied form the Cold Water Cistern (CWSC), it shouldn't flow double that just because it has 2 separate supplies. It's all from the same source and therefore it all at the same pressure/flow regardless. There are other factors that will dictate the output of the shower like head of pressure and the max that the shower itself can flow with that head of pressure but pressure in that scenario would be constant so the shower wouldn't normally flow any more.

6.5L/min is quite low as far as a shower output is concerned and if you are happy with your shower delivering @ that I don't think you'll have any concerns with emptying a 125L CWSC.

Once the CWSC stops supplying the HW cylinder, no more water will flow from the cylinder. That's why the feed from the cistern to the HW cylinder should always be higher than the cold feed to the shower, that way the HW will stop first and there's no risk of scalding, which there would be if the cold was above the hot feed (unless the shower was TMV2/3 enabled)
Excellent explanation - thank you.

So, if the CW supply to the HW cylinder needs to be separate and above the CW output to the shower (I get it now!!), but currently there's no 'space' to put in a new CW outlet to the shower, below the present output, could we switch? That is, use the present, and lower output, to supply CW to the shower only, and actually put in a new, and higher (50mm), CW output to the HW tank?

Sorry if that sounds confusing.
 
currently there's no 'space' to put in a new CW outlet to the shower, below the present output, could we switch
Yes, your plumber would just make the change at the cistern. Cut in a new feed for the HW above the existing outlet and connect that new outlet to the HW cylinder supply pipework and then the existing lower one would then become the new cold supply.
 
We want to install a gravity fed shower on the ground floor to replace an old electric shower that was fed off the mains. In the attic, there is a 25 gall/114 litre plastic tank, that must have been installed when the house was rebuilt in 1985, and which was put in place before the loft hatchway was fitted. The hatch is a tight squeeze (12 inches wide; 27inches long) so adding a larger tank would be difficult/impossible. The hatch can't be increased in size due to the roof trusses which support a heavy stone slab traditional roof.

The tank also supplies the hot water tank (vented). Water pressure is not a problem. There are two of us and we shower daily, so it's not a high family demand.

Will 25 galls capacity be sufficient?

Are there any alternatives we might consider, but haven't thought of, to supply the gravity shower?

Thank you in advance for any advice/suggestions.
I don't think there's a problem. My gravity shower delivers 8 litre/min, but at a lower head than yours. If yours is say 12 lpm, and you shower for 6 mins, that's 72 litre, about 16 gal. That's ignoring make-up from the mains feed to the header tank, which is quite likely keeping up with the drawdown.
 
I don't think the OP is looking at using two gravity fed showers together once he installs the second one? so there should be no problem except that the new one has a greater flow rate than the presently installed one, so from a cistern capacity point of view suggest running his existing gravity shower for say 20 minutes and then just look into the CWSC and check the level, if its still "full" then just open any other gravity fed tap to give say a additional 4LPM, ( the new shower will scarcely flow more than 10LPM max) then run the test for another 20 minutes or so and again check the level, the existing shower can be run on test on its coldest setting to avoid wasting HW.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top