Gutter Press gushes forth at

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you not imagine the schit storm that would ensue if he did name the culprit?
What if it was the future King? or his wife? Can you imagine the mayhem that would cause?
Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.
 
Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.
He explained why he'd left the bosom of the family. I don't blame him one bit. I'd have done the same if I had experienced such sentiments.
 
I ended up watching it last night as my wife wanted to see it.

The most interesting thing was Oprahs hair......She went to her stylist and said "I've got a big interview coming up, I want a style that says "Surprise".....so gimme a Don King"
 
Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.
Why? He gave an example of why he and his missus were keen to leave the toxic right wing press and the UK behind.

You are a bit obsessed with being able to point the finger.
 
Funny how she doesn’t get on with most of her own family as well as her in-laws. Who’s the common denominator there? She's trouble and this will all end in tears, just wait and see.
 
So you do just want to disagree for the sake of it John. Join ignored member!
Aaaannnd relax....
 
G.Why mention Boris in a reply to my post.What’s that all about?
 
You might consider it wokism, if you don't agree with the article. How about constructing an argument against it instead of resorting to name calling.
I think it's an excellent article.

Because although the article is well written it is utterly rediculous and is trying to redefine racism to suit their own narrative.

The article states only whites can be racist as they are the dominant race in the west (because whites are native)

But that is not the definition of racism, people of colour can also be racist against white people and there are many that are.
 
I ended up watching it last night as my wife wanted to see it.

The most interesting thing was Oprahs hair......She went to her stylist and said "I've got a big interview coming up, I want a style that says "Surprise".....so gimme a Don King"

It was a wig mate.
 
If you think that racism is being weaponised, when there is a genuine case of racism, then you're part of the problem.


While you argue that allegations of racism is being used purely as a weapon, then you're perpetuating that racism, because you are immediately arguing that the racism never happened.


You're weaponising 'woke', and you think that's OK. Because, according to you, anyone who thinks that racism has occurred must be woke.

I am not saying that racism never happens, of course it does.

What I am saying is that there are grey areas as to whether something is racist or not. But the default reaction at the moment is to accept it as racist without challenge and accuse anyone that does challenge it of being racist and part of the problem. Exactly as you’ve just done to me.

By shutting down the dialogue you allow people to weaponise marginal or non existent racism and that diminishes the seriousness of genuine racism.
 
Last edited:
G.Why mention Boris in a reply to my post.What’s that all about?

If your questioning the veracity of the claims by saying they don't correlate and imply they are not telling the truth, yet you defend and cheer on Bojo lies.

You know exactly the point I made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top