Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.Can you not imagine the schit storm that would ensue if he did name the culprit?
What if it was the future King? or his wife? Can you imagine the mayhem that would cause?
Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.Can you not imagine the schit storm that would ensue if he did name the culprit?
What if it was the future King? or his wife? Can you imagine the mayhem that would cause?

He explained why he'd left the bosom of the family. I don't blame him one bit. I'd have done the same if I had experienced such sentiments.Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.
Why? He gave an example of why he and his missus were keen to leave the toxic right wing press and the UK behind.Well then, if he’s not prepared to say who, he should have said nothing.
Welcome to the Daily Wail.By telling half the story it just creates speculation & false accusations
You might consider it wokism, if you don't agree with the article. How about constructing an argument against it instead of resorting to name calling.
I think it's an excellent article.
I ended up watching it last night as my wife wanted to see it.
The most interesting thing was Oprahs hair......She went to her stylist and said "I've got a big interview coming up, I want a style that says "Surprise".....so gimme a Don King"
If you think that racism is being weaponised, when there is a genuine case of racism, then you're part of the problem.
While you argue that allegations of racism is being used purely as a weapon, then you're perpetuating that racism, because you are immediately arguing that the racism never happened.
You're weaponising 'woke', and you think that's OK. Because, according to you, anyone who thinks that racism has occurred must be woke.
You supported another vacuous hypocrite in Farage.![]()

G.Why mention Boris in a reply to my post.What’s that all about?

But I'm a rejoiner.