Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

As you have used the words "allowed to" you have rendered the statement absolute nonsense.

He's not depriving the state by being allowed by the state to pay a certain amount.


If you want to complain about those who evade this certain amount then carry on.

Also complain about the state making rules that allow the wealthy to not pay any tax by pretending to live elsewhere - even parts of the British Isles which are tax havens.

The point being morals or ethics don't come into it. People pay as little tax as they possibly can, that they are allowed to, or that they can get away without paying, or whatever frame of reference you want to use. Red or blue.

It would be naive to say that political preference has any influence on a person's want and need to self maximise. We all need to have money to function and survive in this system. In an ideal world there would be the freedom to chose, not to have that choice already made and then to behave as though one has the freedom of will when they don't. It's been taken from them by the state.

In an egalitarian society, much like where we originally came, tribes often shared resources, far from killing each other over them, tribal warfare was actually very very rare for the first few thousands years of our ancestory. It's actually NOW, what with advances in technology and transportation that has allowed a greater propensity for violence and because resources are becoming MORE scarce, less abundant. This is the current system coming to the end of it's life. Ironically the values we once had will eventually crop back up, if of course we can survive the threat of nuclear holocaust.
 
Bullschit.

Don't see the point of arguing about a winning loser, that being Corbyn. A loser is a loser.

And although I don't vote I'm only to happy to see the conservatives win from an inheritance tax perspective, which Corbyn would have reversed. The cap increase over the next few years up to 2020 means I stand to inherit more without the death tax applying, and yeah I'm all too happy about that, although it's completely selfish. Same selfish reason a benefits claimant votes Labours because they are expecting lots of free sh1t. Everyone is out for themselves.
 
Hmmmm tax payers

This is a diy site ? I wonder how many tradesman in here have been approached by customers offering or wanting to pay cash ;)

U know the "cash" payment that might avoid paying VAT ;)

Wonder how many in here have asked to pay "cash" so as to avoid VAT ;)

those who live in glass houses would be advised not to throw stones :) ( Joe Stalin said that ? or may be he did not )

This is the point. I'm pointing out that people are morally and ethically inconsistent and most definitely intellectucally dishonest, well certainly in noseals case.
 
This is the point. I'm pointing out that people are morally and ethically inconsistent and most definitely intellectucally dishonest, well certainly in noseals case.

exactly

stick a TV camera in 100 peoples faces & ask them would u pay more tax for the NHS . They would all say yes

Now see if they will all vote for it ;)

:LOL:
 
exactly

stick a TV camera in 100 peoples faces & ask them would u pay more tax for the NHS . They would all say yes

Now see if they will all vote for it ;)

:LOL:

Politicans appeal to the lowest common denominator to win trust and then BOOM.
 
Back
Top